Randy Bush wrote:
divert
ipnat
ipfw's integrated nat
I believe the integrated version makes configuration simpler. I would
choose the old classic divert with ipfw if it is for a important network
that must work, but if I was running -current I would try the integrated
variant beacuse it seems to
> divert
> ipnat
> ipfw's integrated nat
>
> I believe the integrated version makes configuration simpler. I would
> choose the old classic divert with ipfw if it is for a important network
> that must work, but if I was running -current I would try the integrated
> variant beacuse it seems to be
Randy Bush wrote:
freebsd-current i386 / soekris
i used to use ipfw to divert to natd. so, when i went to configure a
new nat box nat box today, i was 82.3% there when i hit a bunch of nat
stuff in ipfw that i do not remember seeing before. it appears that
ipfw will nat all on its own without
> I believe the integrated version makes configuration simpler. I would
> choose the old classic divert with ipfw if it is for a important network
> that must work, but if I was running -current I would try the integrated
> variant beacuse it seems to be simpler to use.
and one less daemon. less
freebsd-current i386 / soekris
i used to use ipfw to divert to natd. so, when i went to configure a
new nat box nat box today, i was 82.3% there when i hit a bunch of nat
stuff in ipfw that i do not remember seeing before. it appears that
ipfw will nat all on its own without natd and divert.
wh
