On Friday 28 October 2011 16:22:25 nyoman.b...@gmail.com wrote:
> dear all,
>
> I need to set up a router (using FreeBSD)
> that connect to the Internet
> to accomodate multiple ISP,
> so users can be load balanced through
> those several ISP lines.
>
> how can I do t
(using FreeBSD)
that connect to the Internet
to accomodate multiple ISP,
so users can be load balanced through
those several ISP lines.
how can I do that?
Is it ok for you to NAT the connecitons? You pretty much have to
unless
you can convince your I
On 10/28/11 17:22, nyoman.b...@gmail.com wrote:
dear all,
I need to set up a router (using FreeBSD)
that connect to the Internet
to accomodate multiple ISP,
so users can be load balanced through
those several ISP lines.
how can I do that?
thanks in advance
Take a look at:
http
n.b...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> dear all,
>>
>> I need to set up a router (using FreeBSD)
>> that connect to the Internet
>> to accomodate multiple ISP,
>> so users can be load balanced through
>> those several ISP lines.
>>
>> how can I do that
On 10/28/11 7:22 AM, nyoman.b...@gmail.com wrote:
dear all,
I need to set up a router (using FreeBSD)
that connect to the Internet
to accomodate multiple ISP,
so users can be load balanced through
those several ISP lines.
how can I do that?
Is it ok for you to NAT the connecitons? You pretty
dear all,
I need to set up a router (using FreeBSD)
that connect to the Internet
to accomodate multiple ISP,
so users can be load balanced through
those several ISP lines.
how can I do that?
thanks in advance
---
Bogi Aditya
Sisfo - IMTelkom
http
Quoting Max Laier :
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 06:18:09 jmaps-fbsd...@fireburns.net wrote:
I've read through what I could find in this list and also in the top 50
results on google... I can't find anything that'll actually make this work.
My DSL ISP is too far away to give me anything faster t
jmaps-fbsd...@fireburns.net wrote:
I've read through what I could find in this list and also in the
top 50 results on google... I can't find anything that'll actually
make this work.
yes this i stricky for several reasons
My DSL ISP is too far away to give me anything faster than 1.5mbps
dow
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 06:18:09 jmaps-fbsd...@fireburns.net wrote:
> I've read through what I could find in this list and also in the top 50
> results on google... I can't find anything that'll actually make this work.
>
> My DSL ISP is too far away to give me anything faster than 1.5mbps down.
I've read through what I could find in this list and also in the top 50 results
on google... I can't find anything that'll actually make this work.
My DSL ISP is too far away to give me anything faster than 1.5mbps down. In
despiration I signed up for comcast to use for bulk traffic.
Thus, I wa
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> Our redundancy is at the point where we have more of a problem detecting
> that links are actually down and notifying the admin! Once we went for 6
> hours with a feed down because the What's Up box was pinging the wrong IP
> number, and no customers or administrators
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kris Kirby
>Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 12:04 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Wai Chan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: outgoing traffic load balancing with multip
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Wai's biggest problem is that ISP#1 sends all traffic to
> ISP#2. While Wai can set up so that both routes are equal
> cost to the NOC that ISP#2 is connected to, in effect
> he is competing with his own traffic on the link from ISP#2
> to the rest of
TED]]
>Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 10:18 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Wai Chan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: outgoing traffic load balancing with multiple ISP
>
>
>On Thu, 3 May 2001, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>> This gains ISP#1 multiple paths to ISP#2
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> This gains ISP#1 multiple paths to ISP#2 - ie: More
> Bandwidth. Plus, it gives them a redundant backup in case their
> direct link to ISP#2 goes down.
>
> In exchange for this ISP#1 agrees to credit your bill to
> zero - in effect, you are now servi
--Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike E. Matsnev
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 03:32 AM
To: Wai Chan
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: outgoing traffic load balancing with multiple ISP
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 03:26:18PM -1000, Wai
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 03:26:18PM -1000, Wai Chan wrote:
> We don't want to leave ISP 1's pipe empty. If the outgoing traffic is using
> the IP provided by ISP 1, then the returned traffic will be using ISP 1
> provided pipe. It applies to ISP 2 also. That's why I am trying to force
> half of
telstaedt
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: outgoing traffic load balancing with multiple ISP
>
>
>Our old network admin signed a stupid 5 years contract with ISP 1
>(the ISP 1
>uses ISP 2 for next hop), and we added ISP 2 when the new network admin
>arriv
001 02:36 PM
To: Wai Chan
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: outgoing traffic load balancing with multiple ISP
Quoting Wai Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have two ISPs (two different serial links to my router). I want 50%
> of
> all outgoing traffic go through I
Quoting Wai Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have two ISPs (two different serial links to my router). I want 50%
> of
> all outgoing traffic go through ISP 1 with ISP 1 provided IP address as
> source address, and the other 50% of all outgoing traffic go through ISP
> 2
> with ISP 2 provided IP add
trator, Network Technology
Hawaii Pacific University
+1 (808) 566-2423
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 01:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: outgoing tra
I have two ISPs (two different serial links to my router). I want 50% of
all outgoing traffic go through ISP 1 with ISP 1 provided IP address as
source address, and the other 50% of all outgoing traffic go through ISP 2
with ISP 2 provided IP address as source address.
Will this work if I add th
22 matches
Mail list logo
