On Apr 12, 2002: Archie Cobbs eloquently stated the following:
> Archie Cobbs writes:
> > > that is exactly what I am seeing, the clients are behind this stupid
> > > little GVC IP0008 machine, and I am using your mpd software for the pptp
> > > server. I know about the "BUG" in libalias.
> > >
>
Archie Cobbs writes:
> > that is exactly what I am seeing, the clients are behind this stupid
> > little GVC IP0008 machine, and I am using your mpd software for the pptp
> > server. I know about the "BUG" in libalias.
> >
> > Is this part of the PPTP spec, that only one TCP control connection ca
It it true that MPD server think that all clients
behind a NAT server have the same IP address(external
address). It doesn't allow more than one client behind
a NAT server to connect with it at one time.
One solution is that NAT server supports RSIP
protocol.
for further info, please refer RFC RS
Elliott Perrin writes:
> that is exactly what I am seeing, the clients are behind this stupid
> little GVC IP0008 machine, and I am using your mpd software for the pptp
> server. I know about the "BUG" in libalias.
>
> Is this part of the PPTP spec, that only one TCP control connection can be
> o
that is exactly what I am seeing, the clients are behind this stupid
little GVC IP0008 machine, and I am using your mpd software for the pptp
server. I know about the "BUG" in libalias.
Is this part of the PPTP spec, that only one TCP control connection can be
open to an IP, or is it a purely lib
Elliott Perrin writes:
> I was wondering if it is possible to have multiple systems behind a NAT
> connect to an mpd PPTP system. If there is a config trick to do so, or
> someone has figured out a way.
>
> The clients are not sitting behind a BSD box, or i would just create a
> PPTP tunnel betwe
Hello,
I am not on the -net list so please include me in any responses.
I was wondering if it is possible to have multiple systems behind a NAT
connect to an mpd PPTP system. If there is a config trick to do so, or
someone has figured out a way.
The clients are not sitting behind a BSD box, or
