On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 09:09:05PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> On 1. May 2012, at 15:40 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:27:42AM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
...
> >> Also, how are you doing the measurements.
> >
> > The measurements are done with tools/tools/netra
On 1. May 2012, at 15:40 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:27:42AM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 20, 2012, at 15:03 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>>> Continuing my profiling on network performance, another place
>>> were we waste a lot of time is if_ethersubr.c::ether
On May 1, 2012, at 11:40 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:27:42AM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 20, 2012, at 15:03 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>>> Continuing my profiling on network performance, another place
>>> were we waste a lot of time is if_ethersubr.c::ether
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:27:42AM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>
> On Apr 20, 2012, at 15:03 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > Continuing my profiling on network performance, another place
> > were we waste a lot of time is if_ethersubr.c::ether_output()
> >
> > In particular, from the beginning
On Apr 20, 2012, at 15:03 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Continuing my profiling on network performance, another place
> were we waste a lot of time is if_ethersubr.c::ether_output()
>
> In particular, from the beginning of ether_output() to the
> final call to ether_output_frame() the code takes slight
Continuing my profiling on network performance, another place
were we waste a lot of time is if_ethersubr.c::ether_output()
In particular, from the beginning of ether_output() to the
final call to ether_output_frame() the code takes slightly
more than 210ns on my i7-870 CPU running at 2.93 GHz + T
