> Yes, this is normal and it doesn't mean what you might expect. It's a
> generic failure counter, not an allocation failure counter. eg: if an
> object that was just freed fails to fit in a per-cpu free items cache it
> counts as a "FAIL".
Hello, thank you for answer Peter.
But what do think ab
, 167927, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
mbuf_ext_refcnt: 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
I mean 128 Bucket (FAIL) and mbuf_cluster (FAIL SLEEP)
Yes, this is normal and it doesn't mean what you might expect. It's a
generic failure counter, not an allocati
mbuf_ext_refcnt: 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
I mean 128 Bucket (FAIL) and mbuf_cluster (FAIL SLEEP)
# uname -a
9.2-STABLE FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r265433
# netstat -m
3099/3951/7050 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
1392/3496/4888/2015128 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache
