On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Boris Kochergin wrote:
> Additionally, can someone clarify the meaning of "total" vs. "max" for
> these values?
>
> -Boris
>
It measures the amount of memory being used as that type of data
structure. This is the total of the number of allocated items (current)
Additionally, can someone clarify the meaning of "total" vs. "max" for
these values?
-Boris
On 03/12/13 17:23, Paul A. Procacci wrote:
>> How can I increase "mbufs," as they appear above, and "mbuf clusters,"
>> as they appear above?
> You can modify the sysctl's associated with mbufs to suit you
> How can I increase "mbufs," as they appear above, and "mbuf clusters,"
> as they appear above?
You can modify the sysctl's associated with mbufs to suit your needs.
https://wiki.freebsd.org/NetworkPerformanceTuning
The following link describes what mbufs are and sysctl's governing
their operat
Hi.
I have a FreeBSD 9.1/amd64 machine. It runs HAProxy and runs out of
various things frequently. Sometimes it's mbufs.
netstat -m:
68202/1698/69900 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
41449/1229/42678/2622144 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
41449/1175 mbuf+clusters out of packet
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, CHOI Junho wrote:
> I am using custom version of thttpd. It allocates mmap() first(builtin
> method of thttpd), and it try to use sendfile() if mmap() fails(out of
> mmap memory). It really works good in normal status but the problem is
> that sendfile buffer is also easy to
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, CHOI Junho wrote:
> From: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: mbuf tuning
> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 01:12:08 -0600 (CST)
>
> > There are no good guidelines other than "don't set it too high." Andre
> > and I hav
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, 19:22+0900, CHOI Junho wrote:
> From: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: mbuf tuning
> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 01:12:08 -0600 (CST)
>
> > There are no good guidelines other than "don't set it too high." Andre
> >
From: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mbuf tuning
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 01:12:08 -0600 (CST)
> There are no good guidelines other than "don't set it too high." Andre
> and I have talked about some ideas on how to make mbuf usage more dynamic,
> I
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, CHOI Junho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is general guidelines of mbuf cluster tunables? I usually use
There are no good guidelines other than "don't set it too high." Andre
and I have talked about some ideas on how to make mbuf usage more dynamic,
I think that he has something in
Hi,
What is general guidelines of mbuf cluster tunables? I usually use
kern.ipc.nmbclusters="65536"
in /boot/loader.conf.local. But it has limits on concurrent TCP
sessions, under my /etc/sysctl.conf configuration:
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65536
With above parameter
10 matches
Mail list logo
