Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > Jeff Roberson wrote:
> >> I have updated the patch here:
> >>
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf_ref2.diff
> >>
> >> This resolves the !INVARIANTS bug and improves the style as you suggested.
> >
> > I run into several
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Fabian Keil wrote:
Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Fabian Keil wrote:
Fabian Keil wrote:
Jeff Roberson wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf_ref2.diff
I have been experimenting with different revisions to the mbuf api to
improve performance and si
Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > Fabian Keil wrote:
> >
> >> Jeff Roberson wrote:
> >>
> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf_ref2.diff
> >>
> >>> I have been experimenting with different revisions to the mbuf api to
> >>> improve performance and simplify
Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > Fabian Keil wrote:
> >
> >> Jeff Roberson wrote:
> >>
> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf_ref2.diff
> >>
> >>> I have been experimenting with different revisions to the mbuf api to
> >>> improve performance and simplify
> Any suggestions similar to visio for unix?
graphics/dia is the closest approximation I know of.
It might work to run Visio itself under wine.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe
I'll have to see about that. Any suggestions similar to visio for unix?
I guess graphviz can also do datastructure diagrams but I have not used
it for this before. I'll check it out but if you have other suggestions
it's welcome.
BTW I once satisfied this requirement using a screenshot
Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Julian Elischer wrote:
ascii art too if needed...
Also some diagrams in any form you want would be nice..
all that about 1000 words and a picture is true.
I'll have to see about that. Any suggestions similar to visio for unix?
I guess graphviz can a
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Julian Elischer wrote:
Jeff Roberson wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf_ref2.diff
Hello,
I have been experimenting with different revisions to the mbuf api to
improve performance and simplify code. This patch is the first of several
proposed steps towards those
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Fabian Keil wrote:
Fabian Keil wrote:
Jeff Roberson wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf_ref2.diff
I have been experimenting with different revisions to the mbuf api to
improve performance and simplify code. This patch is the first of
several proposed steps t
Jeff Roberson wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf_ref2.diff
Hello,
I have been experimenting with different revisions to the mbuf api to
improve performance and simplify code. This patch is the first of
several proposed steps towards those goals. The aim of this patch is
two fold;
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Fabian Keil wrote:
Fabian Keil wrote:
Jeff Roberson wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf_ref2.diff
I have been experimenting with different revisions to the mbuf api to
improve performance and simplify code. This patch is the first of
several proposed steps
Fabian Keil wrote:
> Jeff Roberson wrote:
>
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf_ref2.diff
>
> > I have been experimenting with different revisions to the mbuf api to
> > improve performance and simplify code. This patch is the first of
> > several proposed steps towards those goals. Th
Jeff Roberson wrote:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf_ref2.diff
> I have been experimenting with different revisions to the mbuf api to
> improve performance and simplify code. This patch is the first of
> several proposed steps towards those goals. The aim of this patch is
> two fold;
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf_ref2.diff
Hello,
I have been experimenting with different revisions to the mbuf api to
improve performance and simplify code. This patch is the first of several
proposed steps towards those goals. The aim of this patch is two fold;
1) Revising the refe
14 matches
Mail list logo
