Re: mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too

2007-02-06 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Mike Silbersack wrote: On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Randall Stewart wrote: Well.. no I believe someone (was in Lin) mentioned that you can get a live-lock if you allow a reduction.. and thus the mbuf clusters were NOT allowed to be reduced.. I messed around with this a bit when

Re: mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too

2007-02-05 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Randall Stewart wrote: Well.. no I believe someone (was in Lin) mentioned that you can get a live-lock if you allow a reduction.. and thus the mbuf clusters were NOT allowed to be reduced.. I messed around with this a bit when changing the limit on net.inet.tcp.maxtcptw.

Re: mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too

2007-01-24 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 08:46:02AM -0500, Randall Stewart wrote: > Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:11:15PM -0500, Randall Stewart wrote: > >> Hi all: > >> > >> Here is iteration 2 of the mbuf patch with limits I > >> proposed. > >> > >> Also note the changes for sysctl stuff that

Re: mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too

2007-01-24 Thread Randall Stewart
Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:11:15PM -0500, Randall Stewart wrote: Hi all: Here is iteration 2 of the mbuf patch with limits I proposed. Also note the changes for sysctl stuff that Lugi suggested. Please let me know what you think :-) ... + newnmbjclusters = nmbjumbop

Re: mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too

2007-01-24 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:11:15PM -0500, Randall Stewart wrote: > Hi all: > > Here is iteration 2 of the mbuf patch with limits I > proposed. > > Also note the changes for sysctl stuff that Lugi suggested. > Please let me know what you think :-) ... > + newnmbjclusters = nmbjumbop; > +

Re: mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too

2007-01-24 Thread Randall Stewart
Bruce Evans wrote: On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Randall Stewart wrote: Bruce Evans wrote: It has a lot of style bugs (4 per line on so,me lines) (mainly weird whitespace starting with tab lossage). That has to do with me using emacs I think.. I will be running that section of code through the style9

Re: mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too

2007-01-23 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Randall Stewart wrote: Bruce Evans wrote: It has a lot of style bugs (4 per line on so,me lines) (mainly weird whitespace starting with tab lossage). That has to do with me using emacs I think.. I will be running that section of code through the style9 (s9indent) stuff th

Re: mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too

2007-01-23 Thread Randall Stewart
Bruce Evans wrote: On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Randall Stewart wrote: Here is iteration 2 of the mbuf patch with limits I proposed. Also note the changes for sysctl stuff that Lugi suggested. Please let me know what you think :-) It has a lot of style bugs (4 per line on so,me lines) (mainly weird

Re: mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too

2007-01-23 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Randall Stewart wrote: Here is iteration 2 of the mbuf patch with limits I proposed. Also note the changes for sysctl stuff that Lugi suggested. Please let me know what you think :-) It has a lot of style bugs (4 per line on so,me lines) (mainly weird whitespace starting

mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too

2007-01-23 Thread Randall Stewart
Hi all: Here is iteration 2 of the mbuf patch with limits I proposed. Also note the changes for sysctl stuff that Lugi suggested. Please let me know what you think :-) R -- Randall Stewart NSSTG - Cisco Systems Inc. 803-345-0369 803-317-4952 (cell) Index: kern/kern_mbuf.c =