Dima Dorfman wrote:
>
> > oops, looks like you already answered that (EADDRNOTAVAIL) in your last
> > message. sorry. If you fix the code to return EADDRNOTAVAIL then the PR
> > can be closed as it will no longer apply.
>
> I sent a patch to fix this in a response to this thread, but it seems
>
> oops, looks like you already answered that (EADDRNOTAVAIL) in your last
> message. sorry. If you fix the code to return EADDRNOTAVAIL then the PR
> can be closed as it will no longer apply.
I sent a patch to fix this in a response to this thread, but it seems
noone noticed. You can find the e
Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
>> +.It Bq Er EAGAIN
>> +A resource was temporarily unavailable when connecting a socket in
>> +non-blocking mode.
>> +This could indicate there are no port numbers available for use when a port
>> +number is being chosen automatically.
>> +Increasing the
>> +.
> if (count-- < 0) { /* completely used? */
> /*
>* Undo any address bind that may have
>* occurred above.
>*/
> in
> < said:
>
> > If the code implements what? Returning EAGAIN when no ephemeral ports are
> > available? That is all the above really says, and then provides a hint
> > as to how to fix it. The description is a little simplistic, as it misses
> > the lowfirst-lowlast and highfirst-highlast ran
< said:
> If the code implements what? Returning EAGAIN when no ephemeral ports are
> available? That is all the above really says, and then provides a hint
> as to how to fix it. The description is a little simplistic, as it misses
> the lowfirst-lowlast and highfirst-highlast ranges.
If no
Garrett Wollman wrote:
>
> < said:
>
> > +.It Bq Er EAGAIN
> > +A resource was temporarily unavailable when connecting a socket in
> > +non-blocking mode.
> > +This could indicate there are no port numbers available for use when a port
> > +number is being chosen automatically.
> > +Increasing t
< said:
> +.It Bq Er EAGAIN
> +A resource was temporarily unavailable when connecting a socket in
> +non-blocking mode.
> +This could indicate there are no port numbers available for use when a port
> +number is being chosen automatically.
> +Increasing the
> +.Va net.inet.ip.portrange.last
> +.X
Garrett Wollman wrote:
> [EAGAIN] is equivalent to the traditional BSD [EWOULDBLOCK], and might
> be used for connects in non-blocking mode.
oops, I forgot that this is for non-blocking sockets...
+.It Bq Er EAGAIN
+A resource was temporarily unavailable when connecting a socket in
+non-blockin
< said:
> the ``.Brq Va sysctl.variable'' should be used. Why introduce .Sc?
For the same reason as we have .Er in addition to .Dv.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 10:47:00AM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> >> +Increasing the
> >> +.Va net.inet.ip.portrange.last
> > +sysctl variable
> >> +(which defaults to 5000) may help this problem.
>
> We really should define a special markup for these so that it is not
> necessary
< said:
>> +Increasing the
>> +.Va net.inet.ip.portrange.last
> +sysctl variable
>> +(which defaults to 5000) may help this problem.
We really should define a special markup for these so that it is not
necessary to so frequently repeat this.
POSIX uses {braces} for potentially-configurable sy
< said:
> Does this look reasonable to people? Based on
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24125
> +.It Bq Er EAGAIN
> +A resource was temporarily unavailable.
> +This could indicate there are no port numbers available for use when a port
> +number is being chosen automatically.
If t
Ben Smithurst wrote:
> +This could indicate there are no port numbers available for use when a port
> +number is being chosen automatically.
> +Increasing the
> +.Va net.inet.ip.portrange.last
+sysctl variable
> +(which defaults to 5000) may help this problem.
oops.
--
Ben Smithurst / [EMAIL
Does this look reasonable to people? Based on
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24125
--- connect.2 2000/11/22 16:01:11 1.14
+++ connect.2 2001/01/18 11:28:14
@@ -142,6 +142,13 @@
The socket is non-blocking
and a previous connection attempt
has not yet been completed.
+.It Bq
15 matches
Mail list logo
