HI
Any decision found?
I have same problems with my server
[root@VKTR123 /home/fish]# uname -a
FreeBSD VKTR123.local 9.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE #0 r255898: Thu Sep
26 22:50:31 UTC 2013 r...@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
[root@VKTR123 /home/fish]# ifconfig
bge0:
2012/7/5 Andrew Thompson
> On 6 July 2012 04:43, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy wrote:
> > 2012/7/4 Andrew Thompson
> >>
> >> On 4 July 2012 23:30, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy
> wrote:
> >> > i have sever with two 1G links (em) aggregated by lagg0
> >> >
> >> > after 1700Megabits i have collisions/errors o
On 7/5/12 7:27 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> Can you be more specific. Did the patch fail to work or was there no
> change in the speed? I don't know what you mean by "on switch errors
> not found"
>
>
> Andrew
I think that was in reply to my question about possible errors on the
switch's ports,
On 6 July 2012 04:43, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy wrote:
> 2012/7/4 Andrew Thompson
>>
>> On 4 July 2012 23:30, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy wrote:
>> > i have sever with two 1G links (em) aggregated by lagg0
>> >
>> > after 1700Megabits i have collisions/errors on lagg0 port, but not on
>> > em0
>> > or e
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:00:07PM +0300, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy wrote:
> 2012/7/5 Eugene Grosbein
>
> > 04.07.2012 18:30, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy пишет:
> > > i have sever with two 1G links (em) aggregated by lagg0
> > >
> > > after 1700Megabits i have collisions/errors on lagg0 port, but not o
this patch don't help (, on switch errors not found.
2012/7/4 Andrew Thompson
> On 4 July 2012 23:30, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy wrote:
> > i have sever with two 1G links (em) aggregated by lagg0
> >
> > after 1700Megabits i have collisions/errors on lagg0 port, but not on em0
> > or em1
> >
> > I'
2012/7/5 Eugene Grosbein
> 04.07.2012 18:30, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy пишет:
> > i have sever with two 1G links (em) aggregated by lagg0
> >
> > after 1700Megabits i have collisions/errors on lagg0 port, but not on em0
> > or em1
> >
> > I'm using nginx in own CDN. and server don't limited my mbufs
04.07.2012 18:30, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy пишет:
> i have sever with two 1G links (em) aggregated by lagg0
>
> after 1700Megabits i have collisions/errors on lagg0 port, but not on em0
> or em1
>
> I'm using nginx in own CDN. and server don't limited my mbufs, irq, or
> anything else.. only lagg0
On 4 July 2012 23:30, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy wrote:
> i have sever with two 1G links (em) aggregated by lagg0
>
> after 1700Megabits i have collisions/errors on lagg0 port, but not on em0
> or em1
>
> I'm using nginx in own CDN. and server don't limited my mbufs, irq, or
> anything else.. only lag
An ifconfig -v lagg0 might be useful here
netstat -m and maybe more that others can advise on.
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 02:58:30PM +0300, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy wrote:
> >Do the ports on the switch report any layer 2 error, by chance ?
>
> I don't have access to swith, but without lagg0 i have
>Do the ports on the switch report any layer 2 error, by chance ?
I don't have access to swith, but without lagg0 i have near 980Mbit's
on one em0 network link.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ne
On 7/4/12 1:30 PM, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy wrote:
> i have sever with two 1G links (em) aggregated by lagg0
>
> after 1700Megabits i have collisions/errors on lagg0 port, but not on em0
> or em1
>
> I'm using nginx in own CDN. and server don't limited my mbufs, irq, or
> anything else.. only lagg0
i have sever with two 1G links (em) aggregated by lagg0
after 1700Megabits i have collisions/errors on lagg0 port, but not on em0
or em1
I'm using nginx in own CDN. and server don't limited my mbufs, irq, or
anything else.. only lagg0 errors (
netstat -w 1 -I em0
input (em0)
13 matches
Mail list logo
