On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:38:16 +0100
"Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> On 2/19/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:50:35 -0500
> > Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:48:10 -0500
> >> Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:10:08 +0100
> >> > "Pau
On 2/19/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:50:35 -0500
> Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:48:10 -0500
>> Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:10:08 +0100
>> > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
>> >
>> > > On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>> > > >
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:50:35 -0500
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:48:10 -0500
> Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:10:08 +0100
> > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> >
> > > On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > > > --- if_ndis.c 2009-01-31 00:22:11.0 -0
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:48:10 -0500
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:10:08 +0100
> "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
>
> > On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > > --- if_ndis.c 2009-01-31 00:22:11.0 -0500
> > > +++ if_ndis.c.orig2009-02-18 14:03:30.0 -0500
> >
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:10:08 +0100
"Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > --- if_ndis.c 2009-01-31 00:22:11.0 -0500
> > +++ if_ndis.c.orig 2009-02-18 14:03:30.0 -0500
> > @@ -2459,6 +2459,11 @@
> > bzero((char *)&config, len);
> > config.n
On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> --- if_ndis.c 2009-01-31 00:22:11.0 -0500
> +++ if_ndis.c.orig2009-02-18 14:03:30.0 -0500
> @@ -2459,6 +2459,11 @@
> bzero((char *)&config, len);
> config.nc_length = len;
> config.nc_fhconfig.ncf_length = sizeof(ndis_8021
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:49:35 -0500
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:27:36 +0100
> "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
>
> > On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:33:56 +0100
> > > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > >> > O
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:27:36 +0100
"Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:33:56 +0100
> > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:06:21 +0100
> >> > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:33:56 +0100
> "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
>
>> On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:06:21 +0100
>> > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>> >> > On Tuesday 17 February 2009 17:1
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:33:56 +0100
"Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:06:21 +0100
> > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 17 February 2009 17:14:07 Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> >> >> On 2/17/09, Ad
On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:06:21 +0100
> "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
>
>> On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 17 February 2009 17:14:07 Paul B. Mahol wrote:
>> >> On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:22:22 +0100
>> >> >
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:06:21 +0100
"Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 February 2009 17:14:07 Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> >> On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:22:22 +0100
> >> >
> >> > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> >> >> http://w
On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 February 2009 17:14:07 Paul B. Mahol wrote:
>> On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>> > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:22:22 +0100
>> >
>> > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
>> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131781
>> >>
>> >> This one should not
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 17:14:07 Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:22:22 +0100
> >
> > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131781
> >>
> >> This one should not happen, 108 rate should get recognized.
> >> I
On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:22:22 +0100
> "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131781
>>
>> This one should not happen, 108 rate should get recognized.
>> I will try to reproduce it on CURRENT.
>>
>> To OP, could you try 7 STABLE
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:22:22 +0100
"Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131781
>
> This one should not happen, 108 rate should get recognized.
> I will try to reproduce it on CURRENT.
>
> To OP, could you try 7 STABLE after 31 Jan? I guess it should not
> change a
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131781
This one should not happen, 108 rate should get recognized.
I will try to reproduce it on CURRENT.
To OP, could you try 7 STABLE after 31 Jan? I guess it should not
change anything but you never know.
--
Paul
Old Synopsis: ndis keeps dropping the link
New Synopsis: [ndis] ndis keeps dropping the link
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 17 17:20:32 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.fr
18 matches
Mail list logo