> On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Brett Glass wrote:
>
> At 05:27 PM 9/16/2014, Chris Hill wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote:
>>
>>> So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and
>>> because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs
>>> I d
At 06:57 PM 9/16/2014, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
Then, probably the only available option to establish a link against
the switch would be using reduced speed(100Mbps) with ifconfig(8).
If you can't reduce the speed due to other reasons I'm afraid there
is no way to establish a link at this moment.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:59:18PM -0500, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
> > On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Brett Glass wrote:
> >
> > At 05:27 PM 9/16/2014, Chris Hill wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote:
> >>
> >>> So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and
>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:53:51PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 05:27 PM 9/16/2014, Chris Hill wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote:
> >
> >>So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and
> >>because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs
>
At 05:27 PM 9/16/2014, Chris Hill wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote:
So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and
because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs
I do not want to reduce the speed to 100 Mbps. Ideas?
The man page mentione
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote:
So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and
because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs
I do not want to reduce the speed to 100 Mbps. Ideas?
The man page mentioned says that if "the link partner enabled th
So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and
because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs
I do not want to reduce the speed to 100 Mbps. Ideas?
--Brett Glass
At 02:37 AM 9/16/2014, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:19:37AM -0600, Bre
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:19:37AM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 12:08 AM 9/15/2014, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
>
> >Would you show me the output of dmesg(jme(4) and jmphy(4) only) to
> >know exact chip revision?
>
> Here you are.
>
> jme0: port
> 0xec80-0xecff,0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfbffc000-0xfbfff
At 12:08 AM 9/15/2014, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
Would you show me the output of dmesg(jme(4) and jmphy(4) only) to
know exact chip revision?
Here you are.
jme0: port
0xec80-0xecff,0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfbffc000-0xfbfff
fff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci1
jme0: MSIX count : 8
jme0: MSI count : 8
jm
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 07:13:44PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> Everyone:
>
> I just installed FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE on an Asus EeeBox B202 (which
> comes with Linux). This particular version of the product comes
> with a JMicron gigabit Ethernet adapter that uses the jme(4)
> driver. Because it
Everyone:
I just installed FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE on an Asus EeeBox B202 (which
comes with Linux). This particular version of the product comes
with a JMicron gigabit Ethernet adapter that uses the jme(4)
driver. Because it only has one port and I need several, I've set
it up with multiple VLAN
11 matches
Mail list logo
