On 03/13/2013 06:27, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Having multiple IPv6 subnets on the same wire is asking for trouble.
>
> For example, I believe an ICMP redirect still (in 9.1) does not create
> a temporary route:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152791
> which beat us hard time (random un
On 2013/03/13 18:12, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Schrodinger wrote:
> > What I am confused about is that without ACCEPT_RTADV on re0, FreeBSD
> > doesn't perform Neighbour Solicitation for the default gateway but with
> > ACCEPT_RTADV it does . Why ? This is Neighbour Solicitation and not
> > Router
Schrodinger wrote:
> What I am confused about is that without ACCEPT_RTADV on re0, FreeBSD
> doesn't perform Neighbour Solicitation for the default gateway but with
> ACCEPT_RTADV it does . Why ? This is Neighbour Solicitation and not
> Router Solicitation
>
> I understand that FreeBSD doe
On 2013/03/13 17:27, Mark Martinec wrote:
> > > I am informed that I must configure my interface to /64 by OVH. The same
> > > as everyone else. So if everyone was on a /64 then we will send packets
> > > to each other via our shared default gateway.
>
> Btw, if the router responds to your subnet'
On 2013/03/13 16:29, Joe Holden wrote:
> Strange, I used this setup on an OVH machine a while ago, seemed to work
> - perhaps something isn't properly configured at their end properly
>
I have a ticket opened with OVH since yesterday to confirm or deny the
future of RA on their network.
Thankfu
Strange, I used this setup on an OVH machine a while ago, seemed to work
- perhaps something isn't properly configured at their end properly
Schrodinger wrote:
On 2013/03/13 15:52, Joe Holden wrote:
Just use router solicitation to ask for the link-local gateway, that is
the "correct" way to do
> > I am informed that I must configure my interface to /64 by OVH. The same
> > as everyone else. So if everyone was on a /64 then we will send packets
> > to each other via our shared default gateway.
Btw, if the router responds to your subnet's (/64) anycast address
(RFC 4291 section 2.6.1 Requ
On 2013/03/13 16:59, Mark Martinec wrote:
Hi Mark,
[...]
>
> > Does adding the interface route not put the default gateway on-link
> > though ?
>
> I don't think it does. The on-link state of an address comes
> from matching the address to a set of prefixes on an interface,
> or finding it in
On Wednesday March 13 2013 Schrodinger wrote:
> This isn't my network so I don't have any input into the matter. This
> is the OVH configuration for their dedicated servers, at least in my
> product range.
>
> > [1] http://help.ovh.com/Ipv4Ipv6#link10
> I read this, I made sure to read this and th
On 2013/03/13 15:52, Joe Holden wrote:
> Just use router solicitation to ask for the link-local gateway, that is
> the "correct" way to do it.
>
Hi Joe,
If you read some of this thread you'll note that router advertisements
are being disabled by the hosting provider. While their documentation
i
Just use router solicitation to ask for the link-local gateway, that is
the "correct" way to do it.
Schrodinger wrote:
Damien,
I appreciate your replies very much, but I'm a subscriber so just reply
to the mailing list. Thanks.
On 2013/03/13 14:19, Fleuriot Damien wrote:
[SNARF]
These ar
Damien,
I appreciate your replies very much, but I'm a subscriber so just reply
to the mailing list. Thanks.
On 2013/03/13 14:19, Fleuriot Damien wrote:
[SNARF]
>
>
> These are indeed correct, thanks for clarifying.
>
I thought that's what I said in my first email ;) Sorry for any
confusio
On Mar 13, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Schrodinger wrote:
> On 2013/03/13 14:02, Fleuriot Damien wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 13, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Schrodinger wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013/03/13 12:27, Mark Martinec wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
On Wednesday March 13 2013 10:17:27 Schrodinger wrote:
> ifconfi
On 2013/03/13 14:02, Fleuriot Damien wrote:
>
> On Mar 13, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Schrodinger wrote:
>
> > On 2013/03/13 12:27, Mark Martinec wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> >> On Wednesday March 13 2013 10:17:27 Schrodinger wrote:
> >>> ifconfig_re0_ipv6="inet6 2001:41D0:2:E7c4::1 prefixlen 64"
> >>
On Mar 13, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Schrodinger wrote:
> On 2013/03/13 12:27, Mark Martinec wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
>> On Wednesday March 13 2013 10:17:27 Schrodinger wrote:
>>> ifconfig_re0_ipv6="inet6 2001:41D0:2:E7c4::1 prefixlen 64"
>>> [...]
>>> Voodoo, indeed... I'm sure there's a /48 used somewh
On 2013/03/13 12:27, Mark Martinec wrote:
Hi Mark,
> On Wednesday March 13 2013 10:17:27 Schrodinger wrote:
> > ifconfig_re0_ipv6="inet6 2001:41D0:2:E7c4::1 prefixlen 64"
> > [...]
> > Voodoo, indeed... I'm sure there's a /48 used somewhere but to be more
> > specific, or rather obvious, my defau
On Wednesday March 13 2013 10:17:27 Schrodinger wrote:
> ifconfig_re0_ipv6="inet6 2001:41D0:2:E7c4::1 prefixlen 64"
> [...]
> Voodoo, indeed... I'm sure there's a /48 used somewhere but to be more
> specific, or rather obvious, my default gateway resides at the boundary
> of a /56 - 2001:41D0:2:E70
On 13 Mar 2013, at 10:17, Schrodinger wrote:
> On 2013/03/13 02:25, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>
>>
>> The network is actually /48 and you get assigned a /64 inside it.
>>
>> Set your interface to use the /48 prefix and voodoo will happen (I can
>> assure you with a 97% certainty
On 2013/03/13 02:25, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
[...]
>
>
> The network is actually /48 and you get assigned a /64 inside it.
>
> Set your interface to use the /48 prefix and voodoo will happen (I can assure
> you with a 97% certainty that your default GW is inside the /48).
> Of course, using th
On 12 Mar 2013, at 23:50, Schrodinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem reaching my ipv6 default router.
>
> # ping6 -c 1 2001:41d0:2:e7ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:41d0:2:e7c4::1 --> 2001:41d0:2:e7ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> ping6: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
> ping6: wrote 2001:41d
Hi,
I have a problem reaching my ipv6 default router.
# ping6 -c 1 2001:41d0:2:e7ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:41d0:2:e7c4::1 --> 2001:41d0:2:e7ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
ping6: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
ping6: wrote 2001:41d0:2:e7ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 16 chars, ret=-1
--- 2001:41d0:2:e7ff:ff:f
21 matches
Mail list logo
