Hi,
Thanks for the quick response.
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2001 11:10:30 -0400,
> Joe Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> In this case, on the cisco router which terminates the tunnel, defining
> the tunnel interface with a 126-bit netmask causes a /126 prefix to be
> distributed in the IGP, an
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 11:33:46PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ??? wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 16:44:18 -0400,
> > Joe Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> jabley> The tunnel is configured like this:
> >>
> jabley> buffoon# ifconfig gif0
> jabley> gif0: flags=8011 mtu 1280
> jabley
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 16:44:18 -0400,
> Joe Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jabley> The tunnel is configured like this:
>>
jabley> buffoon# ifconfig gif0
jabley> gif0: flags=8011 mtu 1280
jabley> inet6 fe80::2d0:b7ff:fe79:a0a7%gif0 --> :: prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
jabley> inet6 2001:438
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 05:04:41AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> jabley> The tunnel is configured like this:
>
> jabley> buffoon# ifconfig gif0
> jabley> gif0: flags=8011 mtu 1280
> jabley> inet6 fe80::2d0:b7ff:fe79:a0a7%gif0 --> :: prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
> jabley> inet6 2001:
Hi,
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 15:37:40 -0400
> Joe Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jabley> I have a cosmetic difficulty in a v6-in-v4 tunnel set up between
jabley> a 4.3-RELEASE box and a cisco router.
jabley> The tunnel is configured like this:
jabley> buffoon# ifconfig gif0
jabley> gif0:
Hi,
I have a cosmetic difficulty in a v6-in-v4 tunnel set up between
a 4.3-RELEASE box and a cisco router.
The tunnel is configured like this:
buffoon# ifconfig gif0
gif0: flags=8011 mtu 1280
inet6 fe80::2d0:b7ff:fe79:a0a7%gif0 --> :: prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
inet6 2001:438:1ff
