Re: ipfw parsing bug

2003-08-28 Thread Petri Helenius
Maxim Konovalov wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, 23:01+0300, Petri Helenius wrote: ipfw seems to have developed a bug lately on 5-CURRENT; # ipfw add 2042 allow tcp from 0.0.0.0/0 to me 42 02042 allow tcp from me to me dst-port 42 It used to work that 0.0.0.0/0 was "any" instead of "me". Last I che

Re: ipfw parsing bug

2003-08-28 Thread Maxim Konovalov
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, 23:01+0300, Petri Helenius wrote: > > ipfw seems to have developed a bug lately on 5-CURRENT; > # ipfw add 2042 allow tcp from 0.0.0.0/0 to me > 42 > 02042 allow tcp from me to me dst-port 42 > > It used to work that 0.0.0.0/0 was "any" instead of "me". Last I checked > the no

ipfw parsing bug

2003-08-28 Thread Petri Helenius
ipfw seems to have developed a bug lately on 5-CURRENT; # ipfw add 2042 allow tcp from 0.0.0.0/0 to me 42 02042 allow tcp from me to me dst-port 42 It used to work that 0.0.0.0/0 was "any" instead of "me". Last I checked the notation is also widely used in netwo