On 27/10/2018 21:02, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
28.10.2018 0:48, Victor Gamov wrote:
On 27/10/2018 19:33, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
27.10.2018 23:26, Victor Gamov wrote:
[skip]
net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 makes frames enter ruleset as
incoming from bridge member, zero disables this pass.
net.li
28.10.2018 0:48, Victor Gamov wrote:
> On 27/10/2018 19:33, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> 27.10.2018 23:26, Victor Gamov wrote:
>>
>> [skip]
>>
net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 makes frames enter ruleset as
incoming from bridge member, zero disables this pass.
net.link.bridge.ipfw=1 m
On 27/10/2018 19:33, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
27.10.2018 23:26, Victor Gamov wrote:
[skip]
net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 makes frames enter ruleset as
incoming from bridge member, zero disables this pass.
net.link.bridge.ipfw=1 makes frames enter ruleset again as
incoming from bridge interface
27.10.2018 23:26, Victor Gamov wrote:
[skip]
>> net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 makes frames enter ruleset as incoming from
>> bridge member, zero disables this pass.
>>
>> net.link.bridge.ipfw=1 makes frames enter ruleset again as incoming from
>> bridge interface itself
>> without distinction o
On 27/10/2018 18:44, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
27.10.2018 22:16, Victor Gamov wrote:
Hi All
I have some misunderstanding how ipfw work with VLAN and bridge
I have following config
bridge2
/ | \
/ | \
/| \
vlan200 vl
27.10.2018 22:16, Victor Gamov wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> I have some misunderstanding how ipfw work with VLAN and bridge
>
> I have following config
>
>
> bridge2
>
> / | \
> / | \
>/| \
> vlan200 vlan300 vlan400
> (igb0)
Hi All
I have some misunderstanding how ipfw work with VLAN and bridge
I have following config
bridge2
/ | \
/ | \
/| \
vlan200 vlan300 vlan400
(igb0)(igb0) (igb1)
=
net.link.bridge.ipfw: 1
net.link.bridge