On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:44:07AM -0800, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov writes:
> > I think I have found a bug here. When the ``divert foo ... udp ...'' rule
> > has no destination port specification, everything works as documented, i.e.
> > all fragments are reassembled and get diverted t
Ruslan Ermilov writes:
> I think I have found a bug here. When the ``divert foo ... udp ...'' rule
> has no destination port specification, everything works as documented, i.e.
> all fragments are reassembled and get diverted to the divert(4) to port
> ``foo''. If I add the destination port spec
[Redirected to -net]
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 10:45:26PM -0500, Alwyn Goodloe wrote:
>
> This is my last fragmentation question I swear :-)
>
> When diverting udp packets which are larger than MTU(1500) ipfw seems to
> divert the first and reject the second.
> Here is tcpdump of the packet
