On Wednesday, 12 May 2004 at 02:53:02, Hajimu UMETO wrote:
Lukasz>> I will *try* to look at it if you don't mind.
[...]
HU> A friend of mine tested this patch on his 4-STABLE box.
It's been some time but i have looked at this and... "There is
always one more bug."
I have one ethernet card in m
Hi,
> On Tue, 11 May 2004 18:07:34 +0200
> Lukasz Stelmach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Lukasz> In one of my previous letters I have mentioned that i use 4.9-RCsomething
Lukasz> and unfortunately this is my only FreeBSD. I am also afraid :-( that
Lukasz> i don't have enough spare time neithe
On Tue, 11 May 2004 18:59:31 +0900 Ume wrote:
> On Thu, 6 May 2004 10:21:13 +0200
> Lukasz Stelmach said:
Lukasz>> Well i *have*got* one v4ADDR that is assigned to my nat/router-box. I
[...]
Lukasz>> harm. Let's say taht to the rest of the world the nat+TIGGER act like
Lukasz>> a single m
Hi,
> On Thu, 6 May 2004 10:21:13 +0200
> Lukasz Stelmach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Lukasz> Well i *have*got* one v4ADDR that is assigned to my nat/router-box. I
Lukasz> have also configured that it should pass all packets that are not part
Lukasz> of some known connections (from M1 M2 .
Byla godzina 16:00:42 w Thursday 06 May, gdy do autobusu wsiadl kanar
i wrzasnal:"SUZUKI Shinsuke!!! Bilecik do kontroli!!!" A on(a) na to:
>> On Tue, 4 May 2004 20:16:20 +0200
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED](Lukasz Stelmach) said:
>
> > stf interface has one feature, very inconvinient for me. As
Hello, and Sorry for a delayed answer.
> On Tue, 4 May 2004 20:16:20 +0200
> [EMAIL PROTECTED](Lukasz Stelmach) said:
> stf interface has one feature, very inconvinient for me. As far as i could
> read the source it returns ENETDOWN if the inet4 address of the machine's
> net interface (
Greetings.
stf interface has one feature, very inconvinient for me. As far as i could
read the source it returns ENETDOWN if the inet4 address of the machine's
net interface (primary or the one would be used) does not match proper
part of stf's address. This is ok if one has public, routable ip4 a
