"Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> revert the old patch at your AP side and try this one
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sephe/rt2560_test.diff1
No improvement.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org maili
Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FWIW I took ownership of a ral bug where AP mode tx just stopped for
> no apparent reason (I think it was probe response frames but can't
> recall). This sounds like the same thing; can you check kern/117655?
Looks similar, except for the part about the P
Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 10:19 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This actually brings up two things:
1) I think we should ignore seq in multicast frames; this is permitted in
802.11 standard. In dfly I did th
"Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> revert the old patch at your AP side and try this one
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sephe/rt2560_test.diff1
I will, thanks.
> apply following patch at you STA side
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sephe/ieee80211_input.c.diff
My STA side doesn't run Fr
On Jan 5, 2008 10:19 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This actually brings up two things:
> > 1) I think we should ignore seq in multicast frames; this is permitted in
> > 802.11 standard. In dfly I did that, since one of our u
"Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This actually brings up two things:
> 1) I think we should ignore seq in multicast frames; this is permitted in
> 802.11 standard. In dfly I did that, since one of our users
> encountered a broken commercial AP which is not 802.11e but uses
> differ
On Jan 4, 2008 4:51 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Are you also using freebsd as STA too? If yes, would you have time to
> > gather following information on the STA side before after and during
> > the rsyncing:
> > 1) wlande
On Jan 4, 2008 4:51 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Are you also using freebsd as STA too? If yes, would you have time to
> > gather following information on the STA side before after and during
> > the rsyncing:
> > 1) wlande
Max Khon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Have you tried to turn off bgscan?
bgscan is obviously not running since the broken ral is in the AP.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
"Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are you also using freebsd as STA too? If yes, would you have time to
> gather following information on the STA side before after and during
> the rsyncing:
> 1) wlandebug -i sta_iface +input
> 2) tcpdump -ni sta_iface -y ieee802_11 -w dump.bin
I'l
Hi!
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sephe/rt2560_test.diff
I built a new kernel with the patch applied, and it seems to help,
though it's a bit early to say for sure.
Didn't help. A large rsync over ssh stalls the connection within
minutes.
Have you tried to turn off
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:28:30PM +0800, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2008 10:38 AM, Weongyo Jeong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Even with these in place in dfly, I still have strange TX performance
> > > regression in sta mode (drop from 20Mb/s to 3Mb/s under very well
> > > conditi
On Jan 3, 2008 10:37 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sephe/rt2560_test.diff
> > I built a new kernel with the patch applied, and it seems to help,
Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~sephe/rt2560_test.diff
> I built a new kernel with the patch applied, and it seems to help,
> though it's a bit early to say for sure.
Didn't help. A large rsync over ss
Hi!
Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
I don't whether following thingies will fix your problem:
[...]
Can you provide a diff?
http://people.freebsd.org/~sephe/rt2560_test.diff
Hope it will have some effect.
Do you have a similar patch for Ralink 2661?
/fjoe
On Jan 3, 2008 12:16 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~sephe/rt2560_test.diff
>
> Thank you, I'll try that.
>
> Could you explain what the RT2560_BBP_BUSY loop is about?
bbp read involves one write to
"Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sephe/rt2560_test.diff
>
> Hope it will have some effect.
I built a new kernel with the patch applied, and it seems to help,
though it's a bit early to say for sure.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
"Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sephe/rt2560_test.diff
Thank you, I'll try that.
Could you explain what the RT2560_BBP_BUSY loop is about?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freeb
On Jan 2, 2008 10:38 AM, Weongyo Jeong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Even with these in place in dfly, I still have strange TX performance
> > regression in sta mode (drop from 20Mb/s to 3Mb/s under very well
> > condition) on certain hardwares after 20sec~30sec TCP_STREAM netperf
> > testing; d
On Jan 1, 2008 9:32 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't whether following thingies will fix your problem:
> > [...]
>
> Can you provide a diff?
http://people.freebsd.org/~sephe/rt2560_test.diff
Hope it will have some effe
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:27:47PM +0800, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2007 8:33 PM, Dag-Erling Sm�rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I upgraded my router cum firewall cum access point (soekris net4801 with
> > a cheap third-party ralink-based wlan adapter) from RELENG_6 to HEAD and
> > n
"Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't whether following thingies will fix your problem:
> [...]
Can you provide a diff?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
On Dec 29, 2007 8:33 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I upgraded my router cum firewall cum access point (soekris net4801 with
> a cheap third-party ralink-based wlan adapter) from RELENG_6 to HEAD and
> noticed what seems to be a regression in if_ral. After a certain amount
>
Kimi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sysctl net.isr.direct=0
Tried that, problem still occurs.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, s
On Dec 29, 2007, at 7:33 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
I upgraded my router cum firewall cum access point (soekris net4801
with
a cheap third-party ralink-based wlan adapter) from RELENG_6 to HEAD
and
noticed what seems to be a regression in if_ral. After a certain
amount
of use (i.e. a
did you check the archives?
one suggested "fix" is to turn off netisr ?
sysctl net.isr.direct=0
fixed things for me when I had ral based cards, and do this be default
with any machine with wireless, even though I use ath based cards now.
Happy new year
--
Kimi
I upgraded my router cum firewall cum access point (soekris net4801 with
a cheap third-party ralink-based wlan adapter) from RELENG_6 to HEAD and
noticed what seems to be a regression in if_ral. After a certain amount
of use (i.e. actually having a client connected to it and transferring
data), th
27 matches
Mail list logo
