Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 08:27:19AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
S> >change message will report either all state changes or those where at
S> >the time of reporting the state changed relative to the last report.
S> >The same assumption is true for the OpenIGPd we are working on at
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 08:27:19AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
S> >change message will report either all state changes or those where at
S> >the time of reporting the state changed relative to the last report.
S> >The same assumption is true for the OpenIGPd we are working on at the
S> >moment.
S>
S>
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:08:28PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
A> > A> You have to be careful here indeed. If the link is rapidly flapping
A> > A> then you only want to report changes in status. For example when
A> > A> it goin
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:08:28PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> A> Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> A> > A> You have to be careful here indeed. If the link is rapidly flapping
> A> > A> then you only want to report changes in status. For example when
> A> > A> it going down, up
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:08:28PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
A> > A> You have to be careful here indeed. If the link is rapidly flapping
A> > A> then you only want to report changes in status. For example when
A> > A> it going down, up, down and all these events got qu
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> A> You have to be careful here indeed. If the link is rapidly flapping
> A> then you only want to report changes in status. For example when
> A> it going down, up, down and all these events got queued it doesn't
> A> make sense to report down->down. This could indeed conf
Andre,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:49:36AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> > we are working on fixing LORs in if_link_state_change() path, and
A> > adding possibility to call if_link_state_change() pseudorecursively,
A> > when link of interface depends on link of the other.
A> >
A> > I'm postin
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
> Dear networkers,
>
> we are working on fixing LORs in if_link_state_change() path, and
> adding possibility to call if_link_state_change() pseudorecursively,
> when link of interface depends on link of the other.
>
> I'm posting this patch for wider review. An importan
Dear networkers,
we are working on fixing LORs in if_link_state_change() path, and
adding possibility to call if_link_state_change() pseudorecursively,
when link of interface depends on link of the other.
I'm posting this patch for wider review. An important point about it
is that, if several l
