On 27.02.2018 14:20, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Thank you very much for your explanation!
>
> Unfortunately, I couldn't get the P2P idea behind if_ipsec(4) and I
> tought I'd just need a few minutes to switch from policy based tunnels
> to route based – local brain contraints seem to require me m
Bezüglich Andrey V. Elsukov's Nachricht vom 27.02.2018 11:50 (localtime):
> On 27.02.2018 12:56, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm out of ideas how to quick-start with if_ipsec(4) and IKEv1.
>>
>> I'm familar with security/ipsec-tools, but I couldn't find out how
>> racoon(8) would int
On 27.02.2018 12:56, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm out of ideas how to quick-start with if_ipsec(4) and IKEv1.
>
> I'm familar with security/ipsec-tools, but I couldn't find out how
> racoon(8) would interact with cloned if_ipsec(4) interfaces yet.
You need to manually configure if
Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 27.02.2018 10:56 (localtime):
> Hello,
>
> I'm out of ideas how to quick-start with if_ipsec(4) and IKEv1.
>
> I'm familar with security/ipsec-tools, but I couldn't find out how
> racoon(8) would interact with cloned if_ipsec(4) interfaces yet.
>
> Als
Hello,
I'm out of ideas how to quick-start with if_ipsec(4) and IKEv1.
I'm familar with security/ipsec-tools, but I couldn't find out how
racoon(8) would interact with cloned if_ipsec(4) interfaces yet.
Also, how to tell racoon(8) to generate such tunnel interfaces, hence
policies?
I guess the
