On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >I can see how these source quench messages would cause problems if a DoS
> > >is being routed through a FreeBSD router, and I think that your patch
> > >makes sense. Are there any objections t
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Tony Finch wrote:
> Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >I can see how these source quench messages would cause problems if a DoS
> >is being routed through a FreeBSD router, and I think that your patch
> >makes sense. Are there any objections to me committing t
> Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >I can see how these source quench messages would cause problems if a DoS
> >is being routed through a FreeBSD router, and I think that your patch
> >makes sense. Are there any objections to me committing this in a few
> >days?
>
> Doesn't FreeBS
Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I can see how these source quench messages would cause problems if a DoS
>is being routed through a FreeBSD router, and I think that your patch
>makes sense. Are there any objections to me committing this in a few
>days?
Doesn't FreeBSD rate-limit ICM
On 09:27+0300, Nov 12, 2002, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> (redirected to -net so others can review this)
>
> I can see how these source quench messages would cause problems if a DoS
> is being routed through a FreeBSD router, and I think that your patch
> makes sense. Are there any objections to me
(redirected to -net so others can review this)
I can see how these source quench messages would cause problems if a DoS
is being routed through a FreeBSD router, and I think that your patch
makes sense. Are there any objections to me committing this in a few
days?
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
On Mo
