While humming that old rock song Yackety Yacc - Dont Awk Back
Oliver Fromme on Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:14 sang or SED something
like this:
> Attila Nagy wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > We use NetApp Filer clusters (NAS) for that purpose.
> > > They aren't cheap, but they work very well.
>
Attila Nagy wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > We use NetApp Filer clusters (NAS) for that purpose.
> > They aren't cheap, but they work very well.
>
> I don't like blackboxes with nice GUIs. :)
But they do exactly what you need. I doubt that you can
build the same functionality with Linux.
On Aug 15, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Brian Candler wrote:
I think Solaris also makes a reliable NFS platform, and it even
supports failover and replication for read-only mounts. For read/
write replicated filesystems, you're probably looking at AFS (Andrew
File System, but an opensource version is at w
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:20:47AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2006, at 5:30 AM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> >Brian Candler (B.Candler) writes:
> >>So to make an update, you would have to unmount from box 2,
> >>remount RW on
> >>box 1, make the change, remount RO on box 1, and mount RO ag
On Aug 15, 2006, at 5:30 AM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
Brian Candler (B.Candler) writes:
So to make an update, you would have to unmount from box 2,
remount RW on
box 1, make the change, remount RO on box 1, and mount RO again on
box 2.
To make it short: if you want a reliable NFS head,
On 08/15/06 16:47, Brian Candler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 02:44:52PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
I can solve this problem with Linux
How?
With a shared filesystem of course.
Specifically, which one? If there is a good filesystem for this application
perhaps it could be ported.
Any of them
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 02:44:52PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
> >>I can solve this problem with Linux
> >How?
> With a shared filesystem of course.
Specifically, which one? If there is a good filesystem for this application
perhaps it could be ported.
___
On 08/15/06 14:25, Brian Candler wrote:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:43:28PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
We use NetApp Filer clusters (NAS) for that purpose.
They aren't cheap, but they work very well.
I don't like blackboxes with nice GUIs. :)
They have a command-line interface too :) Seriously,
Brian Candler (B.Candler) writes:
>
> So to make an update, you would have to unmount from box 2, remount RW on
> box 1, make the change, remount RO on box 1, and mount RO again on box 2.
To make it short: if you want a reliable NFS head, you need NetApp.
If you want to make failo
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:43:28PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
> >We use NetApp Filer clusters (NAS) for that purpose.
> >They aren't cheap, but they work very well.
> I don't like blackboxes with nice GUIs. :)
They have a command-line interface too :) Seriously, these are really
excellent devices.
On 2006. 08. 14. 20:43, Attila Nagy wrote:
that a little bit hackish. I can solve this problem with Linux, but I
would like to do it with FreeBSD, that's why I'm asking. Maybe somebody
has a clever idea, which can make it possible on FreeBSD, without the
above hassles.
BTW, is there a feature,
On 2006. 08. 14. 17:55, Oliver Fromme wrote:
We use NetApp Filer clusters (NAS) for that purpose.
They aren't cheap, but they work very well.
I don't like blackboxes with nice GUIs. :)
NFS file handles are based on the inode number. That means
if you want to have a fail-over that's transparen
s some information in the
> filehandles, so when I'm doing a failover with the NFS clients (bringing
> the carp interface down on the master server), I get "Stale NFS file
> handle".
That's to be expected.
NFS file handles are based on the inode number. That mea
er with the NFS clients (bringing
the carp interface down on the master server), I get "Stale NFS file
handle".
Linux has an fsid option, which can be specified in exports, but as far
as I can understand what's going under the hood it's only part of the
problem. Due to ino
Maybe, one manner for set ip mask
and this magic file handle without dynamic protocols...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
15 matches
Mail list logo
