08.02.2011 21:47, rozhuk...@gmail.com пишет:
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Matveychuk [mailto:s...@freebsd.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 12:53 AM
To: rozhuk...@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: divert rewrite
08.02.2011 19:08, rozhuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Did
> -Original Message-
> From: Sergey Matveychuk [mailto:s...@freebsd.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 12:53 AM
> To: rozhuk...@gmail.com
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: divert rewrite
>
> 08.02.2011 19:08, rozhuk...@gmail.com wrote:
08.02.2011 20:03, Julian Elischer wrote:
08.02.2011 19:08, rozhuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you try ng_ether + ng_ksocket?
It can translate Ethernet frames incapsulated to udp to user space
receiver.
The idea is catch packets from firewall (ng_ipfw, ng_nat was mentioned
by mistake) and pass them
08.02.2011 19:08, rozhuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you try ng_ether + ng_ksocket?
It can translate Ethernet frames incapsulated to udp to user space
receiver.
The idea is catch packets from firewall (ng_ipfw, ng_nat was
mentioned by mistake) and pass them to user space module that do
some proc
08.02.2011 19:08, rozhuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you try ng_ether + ng_ksocket?
It can translate Ethernet frames incapsulated to udp to user space receiver.
The idea is catch packets from firewall (ng_ipfw, ng_nat was mentioned
by mistake) and pass them to user space module that do some proces
07.02.2011 18:36, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
06.02.2011 4:42, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/5/11 4:09 PM, Ivo Vachkov wrote:
Hello,
How can I help?
if you have ipv6 connectivity and experience, I have no experience or
connectivity, with it so
I'll be coding blind and will need a tester.
If you h
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> n...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Sergey Matveychuk
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 11:37 PM
> To: Julian Elischer
> Cc: Ivo Vachkov; FreeBSD Net
> Subject: Re: divert rewrite
>
&
On Feb 5, 2011, at 8:42 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> if you have ipv6 connectivity and experience, I have no experience or
> connectivity, with it so
> I'll be coding blind and will need a tester.
> If you have an application for IPV6 testing that would be even better.
> Divert is often used for
06.02.2011 4:42, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/5/11 4:09 PM, Ivo Vachkov wrote:
Hello,
How can I help?
if you have ipv6 connectivity and experience, I have no experience or
connectivity, with it so
I'll be coding blind and will need a tester.
If you have an application for IPV6 testing that wou
You could make it a google summer of code project?
Ronald.
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 23:20:14 +0100, Julian Elischer
wrote:
for some time now it has been apparent that the divert socket protocol
was a little too heavily tied to IPv4.
With IPv6 coming along now, it seems that we should look at
On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 02:42:45 +0100, Julian Elischer
wrote:
On 2/5/11 4:09 PM, Ivo Vachkov wrote:
Hello,
How can I help?
if you have ipv6 connectivity and experience, I have no experience or
connectivity, with it so
I'll be coding blind and will need a tester.
If you have an application
On 2/5/11 4:09 PM, Ivo Vachkov wrote:
Hello,
How can I help?
if you have ipv6 connectivity and experience, I have no experience or
connectivity, with it so
I'll be coding blind and will need a tester.
If you have an application for IPV6 testing that would be even better.
Divert is often used
Hello,
How can I help?
/ipv
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> for some time now it has been apparent that the divert socket protocol was a
> little too heavily tied to IPv4.
>
> With IPv6 coming along now, it seems that we should look at how to extend
> it.
>
> I see a c
for some time now it has been apparent that the divert socket protocol
was a little too heavily tied to IPv4.
With IPv6 coming along now, it seems that we should look at how to
extend it.
I see a couple of possible ways to do this:
--- the first way:
One would be to add an IPV6 version
14 matches
Mail list logo
