Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/arp arp.8 arp.c

2001-02-01 Thread Archie Cobbs
Garrett Wollman writes: > > I apologize for not getting this.. I'll try another question: why > > doesn't "arp -d x.y.z.w" just delete whatever ARP entry there is > > for x.y.z.w no matter what kind it is? > > Because it doesn't know what kind is there. It could find out, but > then you'd have a

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/arp arp.8 arp.c

2001-01-31 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > This seems a little funny then.. why then would you ever want not > to use "proxy" keyword? That is, why would you expect to be able > delete a real route using the arp command? Because you have a non-proxy (permanent or temporary) ARP cache entry that you want to flush. -GAWollman -

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/arp arp.8 arp.c

2001-01-31 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > I apologize for not getting this.. I'll try another question: why > doesn't "arp -d x.y.z.w" just delete whatever ARP entry there is > for x.y.z.w no matter what kind it is? Because it doesn't know what kind is there. It could find out, but then you'd have a race condition, and in any

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/arp arp.8 arp.c

2001-01-31 Thread Archie Cobbs
Garrett Wollman writes: > > This seems a little funny then.. why then would you ever want not > > to use "proxy" keyword? That is, why would you expect to be able > > delete a real route using the arp command? > > Because you have a non-proxy (permanent or temporary) ARP cache entry > that you wa