It's tunable. Set net.link.ifqmaxlen.
I know it's tunable at boot time; I mean why is it that low by default?
and what will be acceptable value for ASDL connections 8 and more MBit/s?
Maybe that depends on traffic pattern. I agree default value is too
low but I don't know what would be bes
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:28:07AM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:52:31PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > may somebody epxplain it for me, what can cause collisions on tun
> > interfaces created by ppp(8) and openvpn?
> >
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:49:47PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> Adrian Chadd (adr...@freebsd.org) [11.05.01 09:09] wrote:
> > On 1 May 2011 04:43, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> >
> > > It's tunable. Set net.link.ifqmaxlen.
> >
> > I know it's tunable at boot time; I mean why is it that low by defa
Adrian Chadd (adr...@freebsd.org) [11.05.01 09:09] wrote:
> On 1 May 2011 04:43, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
>
> > It's tunable. Set net.link.ifqmaxlen.
>
> I know it's tunable at boot time; I mean why is it that low by default?
>
and what will be acceptable value for ASDL connections 8 and more MBi
On 1 May 2011 04:43, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> It's tunable. Set net.link.ifqmaxlen.
I know it's tunable at boot time; I mean why is it that low by default?
Adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:35:22PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 30 April 2011 02:56, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
>
> > Sending lots of packets within short interval may overflow
> > interface's send queue. Try sending UDP packets with netperf and
> > see what counters are changed during the test wit
On 30 April 2011 02:56, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> Sending lots of packets within short interval may overflow
> interface's send queue. Try sending UDP packets with netperf and
> see what counters are changed during the test with something like
> "netstat -ndI tun0 -w 1".
The default sendq is 50. W
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:46:34PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> YongHyeon PYUN (pyu...@gmail.com) [11.04.29 21:29] wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:52:31PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > may somebody epxplain it for
YongHyeon PYUN (pyu...@gmail.com) [11.04.29 21:29] wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:52:31PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > may somebody epxplain it for me, what can cause collisions on tun
> > interfaces created by ppp(8) and openvpn?
> >
>
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:52:31PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> may somebody epxplain it for me, what can cause collisions on tun
> interfaces created by ppp(8) and openvpn?
>
> > uname -a
> FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0 i386
>
> > netstat -i
&g
Hi,
may somebody epxplain it for me, what can cause collisions on tun
interfaces created by ppp(8) and openvpn?
> uname -a
FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0 i386
> netstat -i
NameMtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs IdropOpkts Oerrs
Coll
tun0 1492 18
11 matches
Mail list logo
