Re: bridging wireless station

2008-08-04 Thread Sam Leffler
Without WDS you'll need to bridge/tunnel at a different layer. Sam David Cornejo wrote: I have an existing AP that I have no control over (assume it doesn't support WDS) sitting on a clinic LAN. I have a second LAN that I need to bridge to the clinic LAN through a client wireless devic

Re: bridging wireless station

2008-08-04 Thread David Cornejo
I have an existing AP that I have no control over (assume it doesn't support WDS) sitting on a clinic LAN. I have a second LAN that I need to bridge to the clinic LAN through a client wireless device. I had done this about a year ago using vtun (via an 'ethernet' tunnel), but then I had some cont

Re: bridging wireless station

2008-08-04 Thread Sam Leffler
Andrew Thompson wrote: On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 12:13:09PM -1000, David Cornejo wrote: hi, i would like to bridge a wireless client to ethernet (in 8-CURRENT) - the last bug in the if_bridge man page says this is a no-no. The bridge man page needs to be updated as its possible to do th

Re: bridging wireless station

2008-08-04 Thread Andrew Thompson
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 12:13:09PM -1000, David Cornejo wrote: > hi, > > i would like to bridge a wireless client to ethernet (in 8-CURRENT) - > the last bug in the if_bridge man page says this is a no-no. The bridge man page needs to be updated as its possible to do this now. > the question is

Re: bridging wireless station

2008-08-04 Thread Sam Leffler
David Cornejo wrote: hi, i would like to bridge a wireless client to ethernet (in 8-CURRENT) - the last bug in the if_bridge man page says this is a no-no. the question is whether this could be worked around - don't need the highest performance, so maybe netgraph or even a userland daemon would

bridging wireless station

2008-08-04 Thread David Cornejo
hi, i would like to bridge a wireless client to ethernet (in 8-CURRENT) - the last bug in the if_bridge man page says this is a no-no. the question is whether this could be worked around - don't need the highest performance, so maybe netgraph or even a userland daemon would work. i don't have an