On Dec 17, 2007 3:23 AM, Ivo Vachkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 14, 2007 1:24 AM, Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a reason that when adding member ports to a bridge stp is not
> > enabled by default on them?
> > Wouldn't it be more intuitive to be enabled b
On Dec 14, 2007 1:24 AM, Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason that when adding member ports to a bridge stp is not
> enabled by default on them?
> Wouldn't it be more intuitive to be enabled by default these days?
There are several reasons not to enable STP on a bridge
Hi,
Is there a reason that when adding member ports to a bridge stp is not
enabled by default on them?
Wouldn't it be more intuitive to be enabled by default these days?
Regards,
Niki
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai