Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
I do know it won't handle non contiguous masks well but as the
ipfw ABI code only accepts a network mask length instead of a
mask, there's not much that can be done.
I may suggest a later fix for that but it will break the ABI.
comments?
What yo
Julian Elischer wrote:
I do know it won't handle non contiguous masks well but as the
ipfw ABI code only accepts a network mask length instead of a
mask, there's not much that can be done.
I may suggest a later fix for that but it will break the ABI.
comments?
What you think about my patch?
-
this change allows one to type
ipfw table 2 add 1.1.1.1:255.255.255.0 0
in addition to the currently acceptable 1.1.1.1/24 0
The reason is that some programs supply the netmask in
that (mask) form and a shell script trying to add it to a table
has a hard time converting it to the currently accep
