Re: kern/144323: [ieee80211] A response management frame appears in wireshark captures before the corresponding request management frame in HOSTAP mode

2010-03-23 Thread rpaulo
Synopsis: [ieee80211] A response management frame appears in wireshark captures before the corresponding request management frame in HOSTAP mode State-Changed-From-To: open->patched State-Changed-By: rpaulo State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 23 14:31:56 UTC 2010 State-Changed-Why: Fixed in HEAD. W

Re: Wireshark, netperf and sctp problem

2010-03-04 Thread jhell
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:27, frank.schuster01@ wrote: Hi Michael, yeah, I see dropped packages. But did you mean only that wireshark didn't capture all packages on ubuntu? Or did you mean that the packages will be really dropped by the kernel? Because I think it's the first one, can

Re: kern/144323: [ieee80211] A response management frame appears in wireshark captures before the corresponding request management frame in HOSTAP mode

2010-02-26 Thread Alexander Egorenkov
The following reply was made to PR kern/144323; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexander Egorenkov To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, egore...@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/144323: [ieee80211] A response management frame appears in wireshark captures before the corresponding request

Re: kern/144323: [ieee80211] A response management frame appears in wireshark captures before the corresponding request management frame in HOSTAP mode

2010-02-26 Thread linimon
Synopsis: [ieee80211] A response management frame appears in wireshark captures before the corresponding request management frame in HOSTAP mode Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Feb 26 14:25:12 UTC 2

Re: Wireshark, netperf and sctp problem

2010-02-18 Thread frank . schuster01
Hi Michael, yeah, I see dropped packages. But did you mean only that wireshark didn't capture all packages on ubuntu? Or did you mean that the packages will be really dropped by the kernel? Because I think it's the first one, can I display the dropped packages - is there any configu

Re: Wireshark, netperf and sctp problem

2010-02-18 Thread Michael Tüxen
Hi Frank, you might want to send both wireshark trace to me and I would have a look. If it is a bulk transfer, maybe the Ubuntu machine did not capture all packets. The number of dropped packets is displayed when you stop capturing. Best regards Michael On Feb 18, 2010, at 3:35 PM

Wireshark, netperf and sctp problem

2010-02-18 Thread frank . schuster01
with netperf). On the sending side (ubuntu) I see in wireshark 24 data packages, and on the receiving side (freebsd) I saw 82 packages. But I can't explain, why freebsd receives more packages as delivered from ubuntu? (I have currently only one freebsd system). Any ideas or something addit

Re: Wireshark

2007-03-19 Thread Randall Stewart
- #tcpdump -s 0 will capture full frames. But nothing IMO beats wireshark for being able to go in and analyze a dump .. searching on various condition's fields etc.. It does not matter to me generally how its collected wireshark/tcpdump -s 0.. But to analyze it.. give me wireshark any da

Re: Wireshark

2007-03-19 Thread Shteryana Shopova
ture full frames. Shteryana Thanks Manuel Ochoa CCNP MCSA MCSE MCDBA - Original Message From: Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 2:05:06 PM Subject: Re: Wireshark On Saturday 17 March 2007 19:16, [

Re: Wireshark

2007-03-19 Thread manuel . ochoa
freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 2:05:06 PM Subject: Re: Wireshark On Saturday 17 March 2007 19:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Can someone please explain the difference between Wireshark and > Wireshark-lite. I would like to install a packet snif

Re: Wireshark

2007-03-18 Thread Guy Helmer
Max Laier wrote: On Saturday 17 March 2007 19:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can someone please explain the difference between Wireshark and Wireshark-lite. I would like to install a packet sniffer on my FreeBSD box for CLI only. Thanks, What's wrong with tcpdump(8)? Other than

Re: Wireshark

2007-03-17 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 3/17/07, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday 17 March 2007 20:30, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 3/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can someone please explain the difference between Wireshark > > and Wireshark-lite. I would like

Re: Wireshark

2007-03-17 Thread Max Laier
On Saturday 17 March 2007 20:30, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 3/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can someone please explain the difference between Wireshark > > and Wireshark-lite. I would like to install a packet sniffer > > on my FreeBSD box f

Re: Wireshark

2007-03-17 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 3/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can someone please explain the difference between Wireshark and Wireshark-lite. I would like to install a packet sniffer on my FreeBSD box for CLI only. lite = cli only ___ freeb

Re: Wireshark

2007-03-17 Thread Max Laier
On Saturday 17 March 2007 19:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Can someone please explain the difference between Wireshark and > Wireshark-lite. I would like to install a packet sniffer on my FreeBSD > box for CLI only. Thanks, What's wrong with tcpdump(8)? Other than that building e

Wireshark

2007-03-17 Thread manuel . ochoa
Can someone please explain the difference between Wireshark and Wireshark-lite. I would like to install a packet sniffer on my FreeBSD box for CLI only. Thanks, Manuel Ochoa CCNP MCSA MCSE MCDBA I will not fake my way through life