* Lars Wilke wrote:
> * Jack Vogel wrote:
> > ok then i guess i will upgrade to 8.3-R, is the driver there reasonably
> > new?
> >
> > Yes, that should be fine.
Ok, with 8.3R everything seems to be stable, at least i could not
reproduce the NIC resetting itself in last 4 houers now :)
But i no
* Jack Vogel wrote:
> ok then i guess i will upgrade to 8.3-R, is the driver there reasonably
> new?
>
> Yes, that should be fine.
Jack thanks, btw. i can quite reliably reproduce this issue.
So if you or anybody else is interested in some data i might
be able to get it.
--lars
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Lars Wilke wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> thanks for your response.
>
> * Jack Vogel wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Lars Wilke wrote:
> > > Apr 13 08:53:07 san02 kernel: em1: Watchdog timeout -- resetting
> > > Apr 13 08:53:07 san02 kernel: em1: Queue(0)
Hi Jack,
thanks for your response.
* Jack Vogel wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Lars Wilke wrote:
> > Apr 13 08:53:07 san02 kernel: em1: Watchdog timeout -- resetting
> > Apr 13 08:53:07 san02 kernel: em1: Queue(0) tdh = 232, hw tdt = 190
> > Apr 13 08:53:07 san02 kernel: em1: T
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Lars Wilke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i first posted the following to the -stable list but got no
> reply. Maybe someone here has some advice for me.
>
>
> Switch: HP ProCurve 2910al
>The switch does passive LACP
>
> Motherboard: Supermicro X8DTN+-F
>
> NIC: Quad Po
Hi,
i first posted the following to the -stable list but got no
reply. Maybe someone here has some advice for me.
Switch: HP ProCurve 2910al
The switch does passive LACP
Motherboard: Supermicro X8DTN+-F
NIC: Quad Port Card, i.e. em1:
em1@pci0:6:0:1: class=0x02 card=0x125e15d9
