Re: SV: VPLS implementation

2010-10-13 Thread Julian Elischer
(labels etc) it's a completely different ball game. I want to be able to interact with other vendors using VPLS. I am familiar with 802.1Q, if_bridge and if_gif and its possibilities. If you want to interact with other vendors using VPLS, you need, as far as I can see, a full MPLS

Re: SV: VPLS implementation

2010-10-13 Thread sthaug
s etc) it's a completely different ball > > game. > > > I want to be able to interact with other vendors using VPLS. I am familiar > with 802.1Q, if_bridge and if_gif and its possibilities. If you want to interact with other vendors using VPLS, you need, as far as I can see, a

Re: VPLS implementation

2010-10-13 Thread sthaug
> > Are there any plans or ongoing work to implement VPLS in the network > > stack? > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Private_LAN_Service > > If you don't need interoperability with others, you can > theoretically achieve something like VPLS using if_bridge, > if_gif, EtherIP and the "

SV: VPLS implementation

2010-10-13 Thread Jon Otterholm
> -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: sth...@nethelp.no [mailto:sth...@nethelp.no] > Skickat: den 13 oktober 2010 11:32 > Till: Jon Otterholm > Kopia: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Ämne: Re: VPLS implementation > > > > Are there any plans or ongoing work to

Re: VPLS implementation

2010-10-13 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
Jon Otterholm wrote: Are there any plans or ongoing work to implement VPLS in the network stack? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Private_LAN_Service If you don't need interoperability with others, you can theoretically achieve something like VPLS using if_bridge, if_gif, EtherIP and

VPLS implementation

2010-10-11 Thread Jon Otterholm
Are there any plans or ongoing work to implement VPLS in the network stack? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Private_LAN_Service //JO ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscrib