Hi,
Just pinging again. I would really like to get these cards working. If there
is anything I can help with... testing etc...
In the meantime I have upgraded to the latest 8-stable, but the problems
are still there.
Thanks
John
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:39:47AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> OK,
Hi Jack,
Have you found anything yet? The box is not in production yet, so I can
run test code if you need it.
John
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:39:47AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> OK, am setting up the hardware to look into this John.
>
> Jack
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:04 AM, John Hay wr
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:54:49PM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:43:46AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Why does the ixgbe loadable show as if_ixgbe, you've altered it?
>
> Only the module Makefile:
> # cvs -q diff -u
> Index: Makefile
> ===
OK, just making sure.
Thanks,
Jack
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:54 AM, John Hay wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:43:46AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Why does the ixgbe loadable show as if_ixgbe, you've altered it?
>
> Only the module Makefile:
> # cvs -q diff -u
> Index: Makefile
> ===
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:43:46AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Why does the ixgbe loadable show as if_ixgbe, you've altered it?
Only the module Makefile:
# cvs -q diff -u
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/modules/ixgbe/
Why does the ixgbe loadable show as if_ixgbe, you've altered it?
Jack
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:04 AM, John Hay wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> Have you had a chance to look at it yet? I would love to get these
> network cards working. :-)
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:36:10AM -0700, Jack Vog
OK, am setting up the hardware to look into this John.
Jack
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:04 AM, John Hay wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> Have you had a chance to look at it yet? I would love to get these
> network cards working. :-)
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:36:10AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
Hi Jack,
Have you had a chance to look at it yet? I would love to get these
network cards working. :-)
John
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:36:10AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Yes, I am here, I have been reading this, but I am also very busy with a
> couple of things, please be patient, I will get on
Yes, I am here, I have been reading this, but I am also very busy with a
couple of things, please be patient, I will get on this asap.
Cheers,
Jack
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:40 AM, John Hay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (Jack any chance that you can look at this please?)
>
> It looks like there are 2 pro
Hi,
(Jack any chance that you can look at this please?)
It looks like there are 2 problems with the ixgbe driver on FreeBSD-8.
I have a Dell T710 with 4 X 10G ethernet interfaces (2 X Dual port Intel
82599 cards). It is running FreeBSD RELENG_8.
1 - When routing (using vlans) there is heavy pack
On Vin, Iunie 15, 2007 7:27 pm, David DeSimone wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>> But the (somewhat weird) requirements are that the vlan interface on
>>> machine1 shouldn't have assigned IP address, but the second one sh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But the (somewhat weird) requirements are that the vlan interface on
> > machine1 shouldn't have assigned IP address, but the second one
> > should.
> [...]
> > Is this kind of setup even supported?
>
> I
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-Jun-14 01:55:20 +0200, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But the (somewhat weird) requirements are that the vlan interface on
machine1 shouldn't have assigned IP address, but the second one should.
...
Is this kind of setup even supported?
I don't see how it c
On 2007-Jun-14 01:55:20 +0200, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>But the (somewhat weird) requirements are that the vlan interface on
>machine1 shouldn't have assigned IP address, but the second one should.
...
>Is this kind of setup even supported?
I don't see how it could be if machine1 is
Hi!
I have a question that's accidentally connected with VLANs, but I think
it's generally routing related.
The situation is :
machine1 VLAN 400 on fxp1 <-- network --> machine2, VLAN 400 on em0
The interfaces on both machines are called vlan400.
If I assign "normal" IP addresses on both ends,
15 matches
Mail list logo
