Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
Just some questions about this paper:
"(...) Note that this route has to be at the same level of the tree, i.e.
the code cannot return a less specific match or a more specific
match (...)"
Question: I don't understand why if you are looking for an alternate
route yo
Just some questions about this paper:
"(...) Note that this route has to be at the same level of the tree, i.e.
the code cannot return a less specific match or a more specific
match (...)"
Question: I don't understand why if you are looking for an alternate
route you aren't allowed to retrieve a
Andrea/all:
An interesting question... the following link has
some thoughts along these lines... and something
for the BSD community to think upon...
http://www.sctp.org/what_is_alt_route
TCP could definetly use something like the above (with Itojun's Multi-path
updates as well).. it would give m
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Adrian Pavlykevych wrote:
> Hmm, have you accounted for the fact, that if packets of same connection
> will be distributed in round-robin fashion between several outgoing
> interfaces and get their src IP "fixed", destination host won't see that
> as single connection and dro
Dinesh Nair wrote:
while this multipath patch does round robin the packets (according to
pathmetric) across the two gateways, it does not change the source ip
address of the packet to correspond with the interface it went out on.
as such, the round robin works this way. the first 10 packets are se
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Dinesh Nair wrote:
> will do. i'm on 4.9-STABLE. will try the following in this order:
>
> 1. the multipath patches
> 2. security/pf port
> 3. rewriting ng_ether to plonk in the new ip address directly into the
>mbuf. along with ng_one2many, this should provide the same
>
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Max Laier wrote:
> On Monday 19 January 2004 18:50, Dinesh Nair wrote:
> > however, there was a multipath patch for 4-STABLE some months back,
> > though for the life of me, i don't know where it's archived anymore.
> >
> > check -questions archives for this thread.
>
> take
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:50:57AM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
> > there was a multipath patch for 4-STABLE some months back, though for the
> > life of me, i don't know where it's archived anymore.
>
> Are you referring to these patches?
>
> http://lis
On Monday 19 January 2004 18:50, Dinesh Nair wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> > lines to the Internet: how would I use both? Could I just provide two
> > default routes? How? What algorithm would be used to choose among the
> > two? What if one failed?
>
> seems to be the top
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:50:57AM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
> there was a multipath patch for 4-STABLE some months back, though for the
> life of me, i don't know where it's archived anymore.
Are you referring to these patches?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2003-July/001843.
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> lines to the Internet: how would I use both? Could I just provide two
> default routes? How? What algorithm would be used to choose among the
> two? What if one failed?
seems to be the topic of the week over at freebsd-questions. short end of
the st
Ok, I asked already asked something similar to this in the past, but it's not the same
thing... maybe it's a trivial
question...
If I had two lines to the Internet: how would I use both?
Could I just provide two default routes? How?
What algorithm would be used to choose among the two?
What if one
12 matches
Mail list logo
