Am 04.09.2006 um 12:40 schrieb David Bila:
I am running freebsd as getway for my office. I Just acquired second
Internet last week. I wonder if there is a way trhough route add -
net and
ipfw I can manipulate my traffic in a such way that some traffic to a
selected network can go through one I
Dear All,
I am running freebsd as getway for my office. I Just acquired second
Internet last week. I wonder if there is a way trhough route add -net and
ipfw I can manipulate my traffic in a such way that some traffic to a
selected network can go through one ISP while the rest goes through the
Multihoming two wan links can be accomplisheed by using zebra or just ipfw
and natd.
- Original Message -
From: "Muhammad Reza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ;
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:32 AM
Subject: Re: two ISP connections, three nics, and a NAT
> At 11:06 AM 5
At 11:06 AM 5/12/2005, you wrote:
I have two ISP connections, a DSL line and a Cable Modem line. I want
to plug both connections into a FreeBSD box that has three nics in
it, one nic for each ISP connection and the last nic for my NAT. How
can I bind the connections together without any
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 01:51:20PM -0500, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> ** Reply to note from Barney Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:39:28
> -0500
>
>
> > Things started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d get a hup signal when rc is finished
> > with all the startup scripts - I think. Anyway,
** Reply to note from Barney Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:39:28 -0500
> Things started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d get a hup signal when rc is finished
> with all the startup scripts - I think. Anyway, if you don't use nohup,
> or a more-conventional way to daemonize what you've
** Reply to note from Don Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:00:10 -0500
> see the lft port (layer 4 traceroute) http://www.mainnerve.com/lft/
Thanks.
> [you can't really block icmp would fragment
Let's say "you shouln't really".
> it would break PMTU].
Is this what you are
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 01:37:52AM -0500, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> ** Reply to note from Barney Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:39:00
> -0500
>
>
> > I don't know of anything published that does this, but it's easy to
> > write a perl or shell script that pings the router at the
From: Andrea Venturoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** Reply to note from Barney Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed,
> 10 Dec 2003 11:39:00 -0500
>
>
> > I don't know of anything published that does this, but it's easy to
> > write a perl or shell script that pings the router at the adsl isp
> > and
** Reply to note from Barney Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:39:00 -0500
> I don't know of anything published that does this, but it's easy to
> write a perl or shell script that pings the router at the adsl isp
> and does the necessary things when it disappears and reappears.
Mm
> Hello.
> I have a server with two ISP connections: a flat ADSL with an ISP and
> pay-per-traffic HDSL with another.
> I'd like to use ADSL whenever possible, but switch to HDSL in case the first line
> drops.
> Any pointer?
>
> bye & Thanks
> a
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 02:24:31PM -0500, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> I have a server with two ISP connections: a flat ADSL with an ISP and
> pay-per-traffic HDSL with another.
> I'd like to use ADSL whenever possible, but switch to HDSL in case the first line
> drops.
I don&#
Hello.
I have a server with two ISP connections: a flat ADSL with an ISP and pay-per-traffic
HDSL with another.
I'd like to use ADSL whenever possible, but switch to HDSL in case the first line
drops.
Any pointer?
bye & Thanks
13 matches
Mail list logo
