On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
> am I correct in my assumption that all fixes needed for tcpdump can be
> handled in our own sources? Or do we need to send these to
> tcpdump.org?
I'm fairly sure we'll need to submit them to tcpdump.org.
I need to verify that I've got the IP
-On [20010309 12:00], Matthew N. Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Interested parties will also note that tcpdump is unable to properly
>decode IPX packets over token ring; I've got a fix for this too...
Matthew,
am I correct in my assumption that all fixes needed for tcpdump can be
handled in ou
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> I've got a patch against -CURRENT to get our token ring code working
> against Novell 802.2 style IPX.
Whee, thanks!
--
Boris Popov
http://www.butya.kz/~bp/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in th
I've got a patch against -CURRENT to get our token ring code working
against Novell 802.2 style IPX.
This patch also may enable IPv6, however additional patches (not included)
are required.
I also took the time to do some code cleanups. :/
Anyhow, please find attached.
My test consisted of mo