I recently was heard to elocute:
>Memory wise, the patches only increase memory use in the dynamic rules (a
>single unsigned short), using a union to store the information in the main
>ruleset since for keep-state rules the union in question was not in use (or
>so I believe - no one has told me
Sebastien Petit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) was heard to say:
>I found your patches for 5.0-CURRENT, I will update it for 4.4 and 4.5,
>thank you Crist.
>Will this patch be commited in 5.0-RELEASE or perhaps 4.6 ? I think
>this is a good functionnality imho.
>
>--
>Sebastien Petit
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Th
I found your patches for 5.0-CURRENT, I will update it for 4.4 and 4.5,
thank you Crist.
Will this patch be commited in 5.0-RELEASE or perhaps 4.6 ? I think
this is a good functionnality imho.
--
Sebastien Petit
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The HUT Project
http://www.bsdshell.net/
On 2002.01.26 02:53 Cri
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 11:39:29AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> there were patches floating around for something similar.
>
> cheers
> luigi
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 05:28:38PM +0100, Sebastien Petit wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a way to set per keep-state rule timeout ?
> > I
there were patches floating around for something similar.
cheers
luigi
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 05:28:38PM +0100, Sebastien Petit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to set per keep-state rule timeout ?
> I want to have a little ack timeout for connection to mysql database tcp 3306
Hi,
Is there a way to set per keep-state rule timeout
?
I want to have a little ack timeout for connection
to mysql database tcp 3306 but a long ack timeout for other
rules.
if not perhaps this syntax can be implemented on
ipfw code, for example:
ipfw add ... keepstate setup timeout-ack
