Re: Throughput rate testing configurations

2008-06-12 Thread Steve Bertrand
George V. Neville-Neil wrote: At Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:51:27 -0700, security wrote: Iperf or netperf are probably what you're looking for. I personally prefer netpipe because it tries odd sized (non power of 2) messages and tends to help edge cases come to light. /usr/ports/benchmarks/netpi

Re: Throughput rate testing configurations

2008-06-12 Thread George V. Neville-Neil
At Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:51:27 -0700, security wrote: > > Steve Bertrand wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I see what I believe to be less-than-adequate communication > > performance between many devices in parts of our network. > > > > Can someone recommend software (and config recommendations if >

Re: Throughput rate testing configurations

2008-06-11 Thread security
Steve Bertrand wrote: Hi everyone, I see what I believe to be less-than-adequate communication performance between many devices in parts of our network. Can someone recommend software (and config recommendations if possible) that I can implement to test both throughput and pps reliably, ini

Throughput rate testing configurations

2008-06-10 Thread Steve Bertrand
Hi everyone, I see what I believe to be less-than-adequate communication performance between many devices in parts of our network. Can someone recommend software (and config recommendations if possible) that I can implement to test both throughput and pps reliably, initially/primarily in a s