Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-02 Thread Julian Elischer
Mike Tancsa wrote: At 12:33 PM 11/2/2007, Jack Vogel wrote: So at this point I'm unclear, with my reposting of if_em.c last night has everyone seen both parts or do I have to try something else? I never saw a .c file so put them in ~/public_html on freefall and they can be accessed as: http

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-02 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 12:33 PM 11/2/2007, Jack Vogel wrote: So at this point I'm unclear, with my reposting of if_em.c last night has everyone seen both parts or do I have to try something else? Seems to work. I grabbed it from the mailing list archive off www.freebsd.org http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/free

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-02 Thread Jack Vogel
So at this point I'm unclear, with my reposting of if_em.c last night has everyone seen both parts or do I have to try something else? Jack ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, sen

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-02 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 12:10:59AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > Although I see it at least one person claims the message > came thru with only the header file, so I am going > to send if_em.c thru again. > Attachments are usually stripped off by the mailing list software, so you are probably better

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-02 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Jack Vogel wrote: Although I see it at least one person claims the message came thru with only the header file, so I am going to send if_em.c thru again. Jack ___ freebsd-net

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-02 Thread Jack Vogel
Although I see it at least one person claims the message came thru with only the header file, so I am going to send if_em.c thru again. Jack ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, se

Test changes to em

2007-11-01 Thread Jack Vogel
This is a substantial change to the EM driver that I would appreciate some testing and feedback on. You just replace the two files in your STABLE tree. Its big enough that this seemed easier than a patch. Whats in this: A change Mike Silbersack came up with, it makes the watchdog period twice as

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-01 Thread Jack Vogel
Eh, what I see is if_em.h and if_em.c, does the version that came thru not have both?? Jack On 11/1/07, Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You just replace the two files in your STABLE tree. Its big > > enough that this seemed easier than a patch. > > Did you miss a file ? I nly see a ne

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-01 Thread Pete French
> Eh, what I see is if_em.h and if_em.c, does the version > that came thru not have both?? Nope, it's only got if_em.h in it - I just took a look at the actual mime stuff in the email and tere is only one attachment in the version I received. -pete. ___

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-01 Thread Pete French
> You just replace the two files in your STABLE tree. Its big > enough that this seemed easier than a patch. Did you miss a file ? I nly see a new header file in here. Am keen to try this out though... -pcf. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http