On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 5:53 PM Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
>
> Am 13.09.2021 um 13:18 schrieb Harry Schmalzbauer:
> > Am 13.09.2021 um 12:37 schrieb Andrey V. Elsukov:
> >> 12.09.2021 14:12, Harry Schmalzbauer пишет:
> >>> Will try to further track it down, but in case anybody has an idea,
> >>> wh
Am 13.09.2021 um 13:18 schrieb Harry Schmalzbauer:
Am 13.09.2021 um 12:37 schrieb Andrey V. Elsukov:
12.09.2021 14:12, Harry Schmalzbauer пишет:
Will try to further track it down, but in case anybody has an idea,
what
change during the last view months in stable/13 could have caused this
real-
Am 13.09.2021 um 12:37 schrieb Andrey V. Elsukov:
12.09.2021 14:12, Harry Schmalzbauer пишет:
Will try to further track it down, but in case anybody has an idea, what
change during the last view months in stable/13 could have caused this
real-world problem regarding resulting TCP6 throughput, I'
12.09.2021 14:12, Harry Schmalzbauer пишет:
> Will try to further track it down, but in case anybody has an idea, what
> change during the last view months in stable/13 could have caused this
> real-world problem regarding resulting TCP6 throughput, I'm happy to
> start testing at that point.
Hi,
Hello,
on one of my production stable/13 setups, MTU definitions from the
routing table aren't respected (anymore?).
I always had jumbo frames enabled and set a fixed MTU for routed
destinations.
No issues with stable/13 until april I guess (but I never checked for
'too big" ICMP6 messages bef
