On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
0n Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:04:52AM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
>After some chat with other TCP folks I'm going to commit the TCP ECN patch
>I asked for review a couple months ago with some changes. Most notably is
>the new padding fields add
See RFC 3168 and 3540. In short it uses some of the options bits to
provide "explicit congestion notification."
-Kip
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Wilkinson, Alex
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>0n Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:04:52AM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
>
>>After some chat with other TCP fo
0n Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:04:52AM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
>After some chat with other TCP folks I'm going to commit the TCP ECN patch
>I asked for review a couple months ago with some changes. Most notably is
>the new padding fields added to the syncache struct.
Um, what is "TCP
Hi,
After some chat with other TCP folks I'm going to commit the TCP ECN patch
I asked for review a couple months ago with some changes. Most notably is
the new padding fields added to the syncache struct.
I plan to commit this after investigating the best padding of the syncache
struct. So, maybe
