On 29.01.21 19:45, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 29.01.2021 22:15, Kajetan Staszkiewicz wrote:
>
>> So far so good. But what if a LB wants to access the service?
>>
>> SYN:
>> 1. LB sends out a packet through public interface becuase that's where
>> the default gateway points.
>> 2. Core router sends t
29.01.2021 22:15, Kajetan Staszkiewicz wrote:
> So far so good. But what if a LB wants to access the service?
>
> SYN:
> 1. LB sends out a packet through public interface becuase that's where
> the default gateway points.
> 2. Core router sends the packet to one of LBs, in this case the same one
Hello group,
On Linux traffic is directed to the IP stack by "local" entries in route
table. By removing such entries, or rather not having them in the first
place in additional routing tables it is possible to forward *all*
traffic through a router, even if it is directed at router's own IP
addre
Hi,
May I know the update please? So that I can plan my project accordingly.
Thanks & regards
S Shamsher Singh
From: "Shamsher Singh (sardarsi)"
Date: Thursday, 15 October 2020 at 12:32 PM
To: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org"
Subject: Query for KNI and user level tcp/ip stack
Hi,
Is there any plan to support KNI driver module in FreeBSD ?
Also is FreeBSD support any open source TCP/IP stack at user space to be used
along-with dpdk?
Like F-stack or any other.
Note: Got basic support info from
https://wiki.freebsd.org/201511VendorDevSummit/HaveNeedWant
Thanks
I view the TCP stack code of FreeBSD-CURRENT recently. It seems that
current TCP/IP stack does not support D-SACK. Does someone will add D-SACK
support in the future. Windows 7 and linux have add D-SACK supported.
The detail of D-SACK is described in RFC2883
Andrei Manescu - Ivorde wrote:
>
> Problem: RouterA and RouterB in the following
> diagram are FreeBSD 6.4-STABLE and 7.4-STABLE running a gre tunnel and
> ipsec transport mode encryption on top of it.
>
> None of them send an icmp
> error "TTL Exceeded in traffic" when the TTL of the packet rea
should have an ICMP "TTL
exceeded in traffic" returned by RouterB have no effect.
Of course, TTL3
packets are being returned by hostB through RouterB and back through the
tunnel.
Any plans from tcp/ip stack developers regarding this behavior ?
--
Regards,
Andrei Manescu
Links:
boseatj...@yahoo.com (bose vemuri) writes:
>Actually we need to implement TCP/IP stack on B
>oot Loader(MIPS). We are planning to port FreeBSD TCP/IP Stack. Please help
> me out how can i proceed further.
An experienced developer could port IP, UDP, and TCP to an existing
embedded sy
Hi,
Thank you for your reply. Actually we need to implement TCP/IP stack on Boot
Loader(MIPS). We are planning to port FreeBSD TCP/IP Stack. Please help me out
how can i proceed further.
Thanks in advance,
Bose.
--- On Thu, 8/6/09, Julian Elischer wrote:
From: Julian Elischer
Subject
bose vemuri wrote:
Hi All,
I have Installed FreeBSD on my Home PC. I would like to build TCP/IP stack module. please guide/help me to build the stack.
Thank in advance,
Bose.
The tcp stackis not a separate module.
there are parts of the system that are, but TCP/IP is not one of them.
if
Hi All,
I have Installed FreeBSD on my Home PC. I would like to build TCP/IP stack
module. please guide/help me to build the stack.
Thank in advance,
Bose.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On Friday 13 June 2003 04:01 am, G.B.Naidu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> The target processor I am looking for is 2 GHz Xeon Processor. I would
> appreciate if you could provide me the TCP/IP stack performance for
> this. If the data for this is not availabl
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
The target processor I am looking for is 2 GHz Xeon Processor. I would
appreciate if you could provide me the TCP/IP stack performance for this.
If the data for this is not available, please provide for Intel Pentium
processor.
TIA
--gb
> On Thursday 12 June 2003
On Thursday 12 June 2003 05:16 am, G.B.Naidu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for information on performance of the FreeBSD TCP/IP stack
> in terms of:
> - Number of TCP sessions it supports
> - Number of New Connections/sec
>
> Is there any documentation available to get
Hi,
I am looking for information on performance of the FreeBSD TCP/IP stack in
terms of:
- Number of TCP sessions it supports
- Number of New Connections/sec
Is there any documentation available to get this information.
TIA
--gb
eeBSD.I had a few doubts.can i make the changes
> from the TCP/IP stack source code of FreeBSD?I dont
> know much about the source code of the stack.or would
> i need to be modifying the firmware of the wireless
> network card which probably has the mac layer code?
>
> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:29:54 -0800
> From: Michael Sierchio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>
> > In wireless (802.11) protocols there is also no CSMA/CD as it is not
> > applicable to wireless although there IS a MAC and it is usually
> > loadable, though documentation and
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> In wireless (802.11) protocols there is also no CSMA/CD as it is not
> applicable to wireless although there IS a MAC and it is usually
> loadable, though documentation and source is proprietary and general
> hard to get.
802.11 supports CSMA/CA, where the A stands for t
the csma protocol from the
> freebsd tcp/ip stack source code.
CSMA/CD is ALWAYS implemented on the card in microcode, usually in ROM
and is totally untouchable from the standard API, let alone TCP or
IP. The closest you can come is a total reload of the code and many
cards don't support this.
I
Not actually.Its more to run QoS experiments and need
to customize some medium access protocols like csma/ca
e.t.c.Guess i cant get to the csma protocol from the
freebsd tcp/ip stack source code.
Vinod
--- Jason Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you mean that you would like to chang
<
said:
> i need to be modifying the firmware of the wireless
> network card which probably has the mac layer code?
The MAC layer is almost invariably implemented in hardware for modern
network interfaces. In the case of wireless networks, that's usually
firmware running on a microcontroller i
Hi there.I am about to embark on a research project
wherein some changes need to be made in the MAC layer
of the TCP/IP stack.We have a wireless testbed running
on FreeBSD.I had a few doubts.can i make the changes
from the TCP/IP stack source code of FreeBSD?I dont
know much about the source code
* Vinod Namboodiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020206 11:51] wrote:
> can anyone tell me the url where i can find the TCP/IP
> stack source code.is the following url the right one?
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/
Yes, also look in the sys, net and kern directorie
can anyone tell me the url where i can find the TCP/IP
stack source code.is the following url the right one?
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/
Thanks in advance.
Vinod
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo
Can anyone tell me the URL to the source code for the
tcp/ip stack?
I found a link but am not sure its the right one.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/
Can anyone confirm it for me please.
Thanks in advance.
Vinod
__
Do You
Vishwanath P wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
> can any one help me with this.
> how is the tcp/ip stack running.is it a single process? or is it
> running as multiple processes.
> pls tell me if i do ps -aef which is the process concerned with the
> tcp/ip stack implementation.
>
* Vishwanath P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010319 20:48] wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> can any one help me with this.
> how is the tcp/ip stack running.is it a single process? or is it
> running as multiple processes.
> pls tell me if i do ps -aef which is the process concerned
Hi ,
can any one help me with this.
how is the tcp/ip stack running.is it a single process? or is it
running as multiple processes.
pls tell me if i do ps -aef which is the process concerned with the
tcp/ip stack implementation.
As far as i know inetd daemon has daemons for applications like
29 matches
Mail list logo
