Re: Switch pfil(9) to rmlocks

2007-11-26 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071126 12:37] wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote: > > >attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks, which are > >more suited for the task. I'd like some exposure before doing the switch, > >but I don't expect any fallout. Thi

Re: Switch pfil(9) to rmlocks

2007-11-26 Thread Robert Watson
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote: attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks, which are more suited for the task. I'd like some exposure before doing the switch, but I don't expect any fallout. This email is going through the patched pfil already - twice. FYI, since

Re: Switch pfil(9) to rmlocks

2007-11-25 Thread Julian Elischer
Max Laier wrote: On Sunday 25 November 2007, Darren Reed wrote: Max Laier wrote: On Sunday 25 November 2007, Darren Reed wrote: Max Laier wrote: On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote: On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote: attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmloc

Re: Switch pfil(9) to rmlocks

2007-11-25 Thread Darren Reed
Max Laier wrote: On Sunday 25 November 2007, Darren Reed wrote: > Max Laier wrote: > > On Sunday 25 November 2007, Darren Reed wrote: > > > Max Laier wrote: > > > > On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote: > > > > > > attached is a diff to s

Re: Switch pfil(9) to rmlocks

2007-11-25 Thread Max Laier
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Darren Reed wrote: > Max Laier wrote: > > On Sunday 25 November 2007, Darren Reed wrote: > > > Max Laier wrote: > > > > On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote: > > > > > > attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) s

Re: Switch pfil(9) to rmlocks

2007-11-25 Thread Darren Reed
Max Laier wrote: On Sunday 25 November 2007, Darren Reed wrote: > Max Laier wrote: > > On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote: > > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote: > > > > attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks, > > > > which are more suited for the task. I

Re: Switch pfil(9) to rmlocks

2007-11-25 Thread Max Laier
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Darren Reed wrote: > Max Laier wrote: > > On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote: > > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote: > > > > attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks, > > > > which are more suited for the task. I'd like some exposu

Re: Switch pfil(9) to rmlocks

2007-11-24 Thread Darren Reed
Max Laier wrote: On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote: > > attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks, which > > are more suited for the task. I'd like some exposure before doing > > the switch, but I don't expect any fallout.

Re: Switch pfil(9) to rmlocks

2007-11-24 Thread Max Laier
On Saturday 24 November 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Max Laier wrote: > > On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote: > >> On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote: > >>> attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks, > >>> which are more suited for the task. I'd like some exposur

Re: Switch pfil(9) to rmlocks

2007-11-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
Max Laier wrote: On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote: On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote: attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks, which are more suited for the task. I'd like some exposure before doing the switch, but I don't expect any fallout. This email

Re: Switch pfil(9) to rmlocks

2007-11-24 Thread Max Laier
On Saturday 24 November 2007, Max Laier wrote: > On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote: > > > attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks, > > > which are more suited for the task. I'd like some exposure before > > > doing the s

Re: Switch pfil(9) to rmlocks

2007-11-24 Thread Max Laier
On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote: > > attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks, which > > are more suited for the task. I'd like some exposure before doing > > the switch, but I don't expect any fallout. This email is goi

Re: Switch pfil(9) to rmlocks

2007-11-23 Thread Max Laier
On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote: > > attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks, which > > are more suited for the task. I'd like some exposure before doing > > the switch, but I don't expect any fallout. This email is goi

Re: Switch pfil(9) to rmlocks

2007-11-23 Thread Robert Watson
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote: attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks, which are more suited for the task. I'd like some exposure before doing the switch, but I don't expect any fallout. This email is going through the patched pfil already - twice. Max, Have

Switch pfil(9) to rmlocks

2007-11-23 Thread Max Laier
Hi, attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks, which are more suited for the task. I'd like some exposure before doing the switch, but I don't expect any fallout. This email is going through the patched pfil already - twice. -- /"\ Best regards, | [