Re: Silly experiments with netisr

On 02/05/15 at 11:19P, Sean Bruno wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 02/05/15 11:13, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > On 5 February 2015 at 11:03, Sean Bruno > > wrote: > >> > > Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing > > some quite silly things with

Re: Silly experiments with netisr

On 02/05/15 at 11:13P, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 5 February 2015 at 11:03, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing some > > quite silly things with lo0 and netcat. > > > > If one runs a cont

Re: Silly experiments with netisr

> On Feb 5, 2015, at 2:23 PM, hiren panchasara > wrote: > > On 02/05/15 at 12:31P, Scott Long via freebsd-net wrote: >> >> >> Welcome to our workload. Granted, we don?t involve pf, but the majority of >> our CPU processing right now is spent in TCP (with the rest being spent in >> the VM,

Re: Silly experiments with netisr

On 02/05/15 at 12:31P, Scott Long via freebsd-net wrote: > > > On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > > > > Signed PGP part > > Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing some > > quite silly things with lo0 and netcat. > > > > If one runs a continuous netcat

Re: Silly experiments with netisr

On 5 February 2015 at 11:31, Scott Long via freebsd-net wrote: > >> On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: >> >> >> Signed PGP part >> Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing some >> quite silly things with lo0 and netcat. >> >> If one runs a continuous netcat on lo

Re: Silly experiments with netisr

> On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > Signed PGP part > Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing some > quite silly things with lo0 and netcat. > > If one runs a continuous netcat on localhost to another netcat listener > on localhost that writes the outp

Re: Silly experiments with netisr

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/05/15 11:13, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 5 February 2015 at 11:03, Sean Bruno > wrote: >> > Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing > some quite silly things with lo0 and netcat. > > If one runs a continuous netcat on loc

Re: Silly experiments with netisr

> On Feb 5, 2015, at 1:13 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > On 5 February 2015 at 11:03, Sean Bruno > wrote: >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing some >> quite silly things with l

Re: Silly experiments with netisr

On 5 February 2015 at 11:03, Sean Bruno wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing some > quite silly things with lo0 and netcat. > > If one runs a continuous netcat on localhost to another netcat listener > on lo

Silly experiments with netisr

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing some quite silly things with lo0 and netcat. If one runs a continuous netcat on localhost to another netcat listener on localhost that writes the output to /dev/null, netisr gets super