--
Vladislav V. Prodan
System & Network Administrator
support.od.ua
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--- Original message ---
From: "Vladislav Prodan"
Date: 27 June 2014, 16:28:41
>
> Hello!
>
> and sends to gmail (dualstack – ipv4 and ipv6) through ipv4!
>
To gmail:
Return-Path:
Received: from [10.0.0.10] (otrada.od.ua. [89.209.81.54])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
Hello!
My sendmail+tls+sasl2-8.14.9 can’t send mail to ipv4 only post hosts, and sends
to gmail (dualstack – ipv4 and ipv6) through ipv4!
- Transcript of session follows -
553 5.3.5 mxs.mail.ru. config error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?)
554 5.3.5 Local configuration error
at 11:39
> > > > > > > +0100:
> > > > > > > > I'm not an expert in tcpdump. Can anyone make sense out of the
> > > > > > > > messages?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you dumped the contents, using -s
> > > >
> > > > > > If you dumped the contents, using -s 0 -X, and look at that last
> > > > > > packet
> > > > > > you should see 0d 0a 2e 0d 0a at the end.. which is
> > > > > > CR/LF/./CR/LF
Hi!
Please give me advice on how to contribute new small feature
to sendmail vendor code? I've discussed it in comp.mail.sendmail,
it adds new flag -F to socketmap definition so ruleset may tell
socketmap's permanent lookup failure (PERM) from 'not found' (NOTFOUND
Synopsis: Page Fault when attempting to run most network applications (sshd,
sendmail, etc)
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->delphij
Responsible-Changed-By: delphij
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jan 4 08:47:51 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Handle this.
http://www.freebsd.org/
Synopsis: Page Fault when attempting to run most network applications (sshd,
sendmail, etc)
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: delphij
State-Changed-When: Thu Jan 4 08:41:55 UTC 2007
State-Changed-Why:
Hi, Haven,
I think this is a known and fixed issue. Would you ple
Synopsis: Page Fault when attempting to run most network applications (sshd,
sendmail, etc)
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: remko
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jan 4 07:23:32 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Hello Networking team, can you ple
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 06:19:59AM -0700, Nash Nipples wrote:
> Upgrade to exim - *any* mail routing policy you can think of can be
> implemented in exim.
>
>lol thanks! i've read about it and i think its awesome but yet i dont
>know how do i uninstall sen
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:23 , while impersonating an expert on
the internet, Nash Nipples sent this to stdout:
> Bill!! you are my superman! lol i dont even know how to thank you.
I've been running sendmail since it became more civilized in the
early 1990s after running smail fo
Bill!! you are my superman! lol i dont even know how to thank you.
all i had to do is recompile the sendmail!! it is truly flexible and
ununinstallable. :) mailertable did the thing. i would like to consider the
problem to be solved. if no objections pending?
next time i will pay more
The door open and in walked trouble - disguised as our our old
nemesis Nash Nipples, who uttered, at Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:27 :
> Duane Whitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nash Nipples wrote:
> >hi, i just dont see any options to make it work
> > "|
Brian Candler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:47:48AM
-0700, Nash Nipples wrote:
>hi, i just dont see any options to make it work
>
> "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -Ac -t" works fine
> but "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -O ConnectOnlyTo
how can i ask sendmail to give up an email to "another" smtp agent when the
destination user is considered local but not trusted to run a different
submit.cf basicly it could turn into a possible leak attempt unless its defined
in a local "but not really local" routing tabl
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:47:48AM -0700, Nash Nipples wrote:
>hi, i just dont see any options to make it work
>
> "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -Ac -t" works fine
> but "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -O ConnectOnlyTo=smtp.external.co... -Ac -t" just
> wont
Duane Whitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nash Nipples wrote:
>hi, i just dont see any options to make it work
>
> "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -Ac -t" works fine
> but "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -O ConnectOnlyTo=smtp.external.co... -Ac -t" just
>
Nash Nipples wrote:
hi, i just dont see any options to make it work
"| /usr/sbin/sendmail -Ac -t" works fine
but "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -O ConnectOnlyTo=smtp.external.co... -Ac -t" just
wont work:
WARNING: RunAsUser for MSP ignored, check group ids (egid=1010
hi, i just dont see any options to make it work
"| /usr/sbin/sendmail -Ac -t" works fine
but "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -O ConnectOnlyTo=smtp.external.co... -Ac -t" just
wont work:
WARNING: RunAsUser for MSP ignored, check group ids (egid=10103, want=25)
can
Sendmail ssl server certificates cache where?
thanks.
Nash
-
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hi freebsd-net@ folk.
I've been having problems trying to simultaneously configure my 4.9
home client gateway & my remote 24/7 server to provide an Auth +
SASL outgoing sendmail channel. My fault not FreeBSD's but I'm
asking for help. One problem is I dont have a known good
Hello all,
I have a strange problem with a sendmail (+milter +spamcop). Attached are my
conf files.
I have a stable box with a public ip address and, on this box, I run a jail
with a private ip address, firewalled and natted.
I would like to have a domain (domain.com) on my box which redirect
When asked his whereabouts on Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 15:00 ,
Eicke took the fifth, drank it, and then slurred:
> Hi folks,
> I have a machine with FreeBSD 4.6 and Sendmail 8.12.3
> I need only sent e-mails using this machine. My rc.conf contents the
> following:
> sendmail_enab
Hi folks,
I have a machine with FreeBSD 4.6 and Sendmail 8.12.3
I need only sent e-mails using this machine. My rc.conf contents the
following:
sendmail_enable="NONE"
When I try to send a simple mail an error occours:
# cat /etc/rc.conf | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# can not chdir(
> Generally, sendmail uses flock() on the aliases file and related databases
> to ensure consistency. As far as I know, it's unrelated to redirection.
And for locking queue files.
> > Here is what Control-T does
> > load: 0.20 cmd: sendmail 292 [pause] 0.02u 0.04s
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, David Yeske wrote:
> This is when sendmail is ran from virecover.
>
> Is this because sendmail is taking redirection, and it needs to flock()
> for that?
Generally, sendmail uses flock() on the aliases file and related databases
to ensure consistency. As f
This is when sendmail is ran from virecover.
Is this because sendmail is taking redirection,
and it needs to flock() for that?
I think a solution could be to make virecover called later on.
Why are rpc.lockd and rpc.statd not started directly after
rpcbind?
Here is some more output.
Recovering
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, David Yeske wrote:
> Jun 8 00:52:33 photon sendmail[293]: h584pRfm000293: SYSERR(root): cannot
> flock(./tfh584pRfm000293, fd=5, type=6, omode=40001, euid=25^C.
> NFS access cache time=2
> Starting statd.
> Starting lockd.
>
> It looks like sendmail st
Jun 8 00:52:33 photon sendmail[293]: h584pRfm000293: SYSERR(root): cannot
flock(./tfh584pRfm000293, fd=5, type=6, omode=40001, euid=25^C.
NFS access cache time=2
Starting statd.
Starting lockd.
I should clarify that /etc/rc.d/virecover is calling sendmail.
Does virecover need to be called this
Jun 8 00:52:33 photon sendmail[293]: h584pRfm000293: SYSERR(root): cannot
flock(./tfh584pRfm000293, fd=5, type=6, omode=40001, euid=25^C.
NFS access cache time=2
Starting statd.
Starting lockd.
It looks like sendmail starts before rpc.lockd and rpc.statd? This will cause
diskless clients to
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, John Angelmo wrote:
> I'm intrested in implementing sendmail with AUTH agains passwd, I have
> only been able to do this agains TSL with their database, has anyone
> tried agains passwd and got it to work?
One approach that has been used with success by
Hello
I'm intrested in implementing sendmail with AUTH agains passwd, I have
only been able to do this agains TSL with their database, has anyone
tried agains passwd and got it to work?
/John
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in
mi+mx> I set things up once some time ago for one of my machines to relay
mi+mx> e-mail from another -- based on SSL-certificate presented. I'm my
mi+mx> own issuer. The setup was working for a while, but broke recently --
mi+mx> the relay-to-be now rejects relaying, even though it verifies the
mi+
06699: <-- RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Feb 3 17:49:24 aldan sm-mta[6699]: h13MnNBO006699: --- 550 5.7.1
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Relaying denied
The (my own) authority's certificate did not change in months, and
neither did the the /etc/mail/access. What changed was the sendmail's
>
> I did a tcpdump on the NAT box on network A - it never records any
incoming
> packets destined for port 25 whatsoever. However, it does record
incoming
> packets for port 81 (the administration web server for the mail
server.)
>
> Therein lies the answer. It would appear that the ISP providin
Hi,
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> The problem I'm having is that I cannot connect to the mail server on
> network A (10.0.0.2) from any machine behind the NAT gateway on network B.
The mailserver is BEHIND the NAT box on network A? If so does your NAT do
any form of forwarding?
nect fine to other services running on the same machine?
>
> My first guess would be to see if you're really "unable" to connect to
> sendmail. Check the configuration on sendmail to see if it's set up to
> do reverse lookups. It may be trying to resolve the IP you
e payload) don't work at
all with NATs unless the NAT box mucks with the payload data. The only
one I know of that most NATs support is FTP - maybe sendmail puts
network info into the payload, too?
Lars
--
Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Information Sciences Institu
I've got two networks -- A (10.0.0.0/24) and B (192.168.0.0/24), both
behind NAT gateways.
The problem I'm having is that I cannot connect to the mail server on
network A (10.0.0.2) from any machine behind the NAT gateway on network B.
However, any system on network B can successfully ping the g
rew J. Weaver;
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: DNS causing problems
with sendmail?
After the 2 or 3 minute delay, does
it work? Looked in /var/log/maillog for reject causes? Are all the
hosts you want to allow to send specified in /etc/mail/relay-domains? If
you want to try to see if d
]'Subject: DNS causing
problems with sendmail?
Hi, I've had this problem for a
few days now, we have a small dial-up ISP and when users dial into one of our
cities they get a 209.xxx.xxx.xxx IP and our mail server responds normally, we
have another modem pool in that city t
y
Bri
- Original Message -
From:
Drew J.
Weaver
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 5:40
AM
Subject: DNS causing problems with
sendmail?
Hi, I've had this problem for a
few days now, we have a small dial-up ISP and when users
ets a 206.xxx.xxx.xxx IP address and they attempt to
check mail it takes a good 2-3 minutes before the sendmail
connection starts, which is an obvious problem because of the timeouts on email
clients (and.. 2-3 minutes is just bad). I've been kinda
asking around on comp.mail.sendmail about this
On 6 Aug 2001, Kirk Strauser wrote:
>
> At 2001-08-06T15:34:44Z, Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hope you never need to communicate with anyone in the *real* .int
> > domain
>
> Why would I ever want to do that?
>
> This is offtopic, but isn't that also the recommended dom
At 2001-08-06T15:34:44Z, Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hope you never need to communicate with anyone in the *real* .int
> domain
Why would I ever want to do that?
This is offtopic, but isn't that also the recommended domain for internal
networks? I was under the impress
< said:
> I'm using sendmail 8.11.5 on a FreeBSD-STABLE (4.4-PRERELEASE) system. I
> use the `.int' domain for hosts on my LAN
Hope you never need to communicate with anyone in the *real* .int
domain
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "
> That should take care of it...
Tony,
Actually, it turned out to be a little more subtle. The DOMAIN(generic)
directive includes /usr/share/sendmail/cf/generic.m4, which has the line
EXPOSED_USER(`root'), which was the exact cause of the error I was getting.
I copied generic.m4 to int.m4,
EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kirk Strauser
* Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 12:46 PM
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject: Can't get sendmail to masquerade
*
*
* I'm using sendmail 8.11.5 on a FreeBSD-STABLE
* (4.4-PRERELEASE) system. I
* use the `.int' domain for hosts on my LAN, and the do
I'm using sendmail 8.11.5 on a FreeBSD-STABLE (4.4-PRERELEASE) system. I
use the `.int' domain for hosts on my LAN, and the domain `strauser.com' for
mail to and from all hosts. My mailserver/gateway/etc., the forementioned
FreeBSD server, is named `kanga.int'. I though
: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 6:13
AM
Subject: Sendmail
Before I dig too deep into the Sendmail
documentation I wanted to ensure that the following is possible.
My FreeBSD box is performing NATd and IPFW
functions for a few PCs at home, off of my cable modem. Wheneve I attempt to
Before I dig too deep into the Sendmail
documentation I wanted to ensure that the following is possible.
My FreeBSD box is performing NATd and IPFW
functions for a few PCs at home, off of my cable modem. Wheneve I attempt to
send an e-mail from my system I receive a message back from
Hi --
I am using BSD_4.3-RELEASE and have a problem with service.switch.
I want sendmail to deliver to hosts on the local network without
consulting DNS -- i.e. to check /etc/hosts for IP addresses.
If I place the following line in /etc/mail/service.switch
hosts files
everything works as
sean-freebsd> I found the bug. The socket was IPv6, but the bind used an
sean-freebsd> IPv4 sockaddr struct. Patch attached.
sean-freebsd> - s = socket(addr.sa.sa_family, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
sean-freebsd> + s = socket(clt_addr.sa.sa_family, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
Thanks
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 10:22, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > >Well, I have had the same problem. The solution was in removing IPv6
> > >support. I have not done any futher investigations.
> >
> > please file a bug report to sendmail.org.
Hello,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Well, I have had the same problem. The solution was in removing IPv6
> >support. I have not done any futher investigations.
>
> please file a bug report to sendmail.org.
It seems Sean Farley has already done the patch. Thank you Sean
I found the bug. The socket was IPv6, but the bind used an IPv4 sockaddr
struct. Patch attached.
Sean
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP key: http://www.farley.org/~sean/pgp.key
--- daemon.c.orig Fri Apr 27 14:27:51 2001
+++ daemon.cFri Apr 27 14:28:14 2001
@@ -2012,7
>Well, I have had the same problem. The solution was in removing IPv6
>support. I have not done any futher investigations.
please file a bug report to sendmail.org.
itojun
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Hello,
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Sean Farley wrote:
> I previously posted this on comp.mail.sendmail and freebsd-questions.
> After no answer and some extra testing, I believe this probably belongs
> here.
>
>
>
> I need some help debugging a problem I am having wit
ss you should be using
> DaemonPortOptions instead.
>
> note that, if you are running on-demand dialup, DaemonPortOptions
> will choke while your modem line is not connected.
Actually, Sendmail works with on-demand PPP whether it is up or not.
Also, DaemonPortOptions only affects
>I only wish it to receive on the LAN (192.168.1.0) and the analog modem
>(216.140.158.72). This is easy to change (DAEMON_OPTIONS), but I just
>can't get confCLIENT_OPTIONS to work. From looking at sendmail.cf, I can
>see that it is being set:
>
># SMTP client options
>O ClientPortOptions=Famil
I previously posted this on comp.mail.sendmail and freebsd-questions.
After no answer and some extra testing, I believe this probably belongs
here.
I need some help debugging a problem I am having with setting up Sendmail.
Previously, I have been using Exim, but I have decided to try
61 matches
Mail list logo
