Re: SCTP using questions (API etc.)

2008-04-16 Thread Randall Stewart
Vadim: Sorry I have not chimed in earlier.. I tend to "not look" often at some of my boxes :-) Glad Michael helped out here .. thanks Michael Vadim Goncharov wrote: Hi Michael Tuexen! On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:34:13 +0100; Michael Tuexen wrote about 'Re: SCTP using que

Re: SCTP using questions (API etc.)

2008-03-07 Thread Vadim Goncharov
Hi Michael Tuexen! On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:34:13 +0100; Michael Tuexen wrote about 'Re: SCTP using questions (API etc.)': >>>> "substreams". SCTP can do it for me, it's wonderful, but in practice >>>> there >>>> are some questions.

Re: SCTP using questions (API etc.)

2008-03-06 Thread Michael Tuexen
On Mar 5, 2008, at 8:07 PM, Vadim Goncharov wrote: Hi Michael Tuexen! On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:59:14 +0100; Michael Tuexen wrote about 'Re: SCTP using questions (API etc.)': "substreams". SCTP can do it for me, it's wonderful, but in practice there are some questi

Re: SCTP using questions (API etc.)

2008-03-05 Thread Vadim Goncharov
Hi Michael Tuexen! On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:59:14 +0100; Michael Tuexen wrote about 'Re: SCTP using questions (API etc.)': >> "substreams". SCTP can do it for me, it's wonderful, but in practice >> there >> are some questions. >> >> How lon

Re: SCTP using questions (API etc.)

2008-03-05 Thread Michael Tuexen
Hi Vadim, comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Mar 5, 2008, at 11:10 AM, Vadim Goncharov wrote: Hi! I've seen that FreeBSD 7.0 is a reference implementation for SCTP, which is a great protocol, good work! But as I was looking through man pages for new API, I couldn't understand so

SCTP using questions (API etc.)

2008-03-05 Thread Vadim Goncharov
Hi! I've seen that FreeBSD 7.0 is a reference implementation for SCTP, which is a great protocol, good work! But as I was looking through man pages for new API, I couldn't understand some issues with high-load servers. Currently, I am developing client-server application for my needs, and I want