Koroush Saraf wrote:
> Since I have a single nic card I invoke the following:
> routed -s
> I also have used the flags -P pm_rdisc and -P rdisc_interval=45, but I think
> that's irrelevant at this moment.
As someone else noted, you'll need ripv2.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Koroush Saraf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Koroush Saraf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: Routing question, Routed using one interface (more info)
>
Koroush Saraf wrote:
> I have several bsd4.3 computers each with one NIC on a shared LAN as below:
Well, on a shared link layer network...
> Now I like to turn on Routed, and have the approperiate routes discovered.
what options are you invoking routed with? do you have firewall enabled?
T
As I have said before. RIP (routed) won't announce a 10.x.x.x network
address, regardless of your VLSM netmask, as anything but 255.0.0.0,
i.e. 10/8.
You may be able to work around this using RIPv2. I haven't played with
FreeBSD's implementation of it. Otherwise, using RIPv1, try using
several di
I'm making a new post to attach the network diagram in order to clarify my
question.
I have several bsd4.3 computers each with one NIC on a shared LAN as below:
+-+
|10.1.1.1/24 |
| +--+
| | |
+-+ |
|
+-+ |
|10.1.1.
> Also I have addressed my computers in the 10.x.x.x range which is the
> private IP address range and not internet routable. Does ROUTED care about
> the range of addresses in use or all IP addresses are using in the routing
> table as valid routable addresses. Just wanted to make sure this
Hi All,
I like to know why when I turn on ROUTED on my machines they don't discover
the attached subnets to the link. The scenario is below:
I' have several bsd computers each with one network card. All the computers
sit on a shared Ethernet. I like to perform some routing simulations
comparing
