Ya, it might be nice to do a bunch of cleanup like that, maybe once the
i40e
release happens I'll have some time to look into that.
Jack
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>> I don't think we've ever tried this at
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> I don't think we've ever tried this at Intel either. I had meant to check
> the ixv code to
> see if it had your code in it Luigi but got distracted, if it doesn't then
> it obviously can't
> work for the case of a VM.
>
ixv.c does not contai
I don't think we've ever tried this at Intel either. I had meant to check
the ixv code to
see if it had your code in it Luigi but got distracted, if it doesn't then
it obviously can't
work for the case of a VM.
I think with the new 40G VF driver, when that gets committed it might be
desirable to
h
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:28:45AM +0530, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose I am on x86 with Intel 82599 NIC.
> Now I spawn a VM (running FreeBSD as guest OS with Netmap support)
> For better I/O performance, I have two main choices --
>
> 1. Pass the 82599 NIC as a PCI passthrough devi
Hi,
Suppose I am on x86 with Intel 82599 NIC.
Now I spawn a VM (running FreeBSD as guest OS with Netmap support)
For better I/O performance, I have two main choices --
1. Pass the 82599 NIC as a PCI passthrough device into the VM
2. Use SRIOV VF of 82599 into the VM
Question is, will Netmap be a
