Re: using natd to load balance port 80 to multiple servers

2004-11-19 Thread Sangwoo Shim
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 01:18:47PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > I will repeat my suggestion that you use a real IP on your webserver and > switch from doing PF + NAT to doing PF or IPFW + bridging instead. Is it possible (in -current of RELENG_5) to filter bridged packets using PF? I know I ca

Re: using natd to load balance port 80 to multiple servers

2004-11-19 Thread Chuck Swiger
Stephane Raimbault wrote: I finally got around to testing out FreeBSD 5.3 + pf to replace my FreeBSD 4.9 + natd to forward port 80 to multiple backend servers. I see a huge performance diffrence. FreeBSD 5.3 + pf runs about about < 5% where FreeBSD 4.9 + natd was doing the same thing for around

Re: using natd to load balance port 80 to multiple servers

2004-11-19 Thread Stephane Raimbault
a bug? Otherwise it seems like the system is running quite well and I am very pleased. Thank you for your suggestion to pf, Stephane. From: Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Stephane Raimbault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: using natd to load balance port

Re: using natd to load balance port 80 to multiple servers

2004-10-26 Thread .
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > Stephane Raimbault wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'm currently using a freebsd box running natd to forward port 80 to > > several (5) web servers on private IP's. > > > > I have discovered that natd doesn't handle many requests/second all that >

Re: using natd to load balance port 80 to multiple servers

2004-10-24 Thread Julian Elischer
Bill Fumerola wrote: On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 09:50:02PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: Stephane Raimbault wrote: I'm currently using a freebsd box running natd to forward port 80 to several (5) web servers on private IP's. I have discovered that natd doesn't handle many requests/second all that w

Re: using natd to load balance port 80 to multiple servers

2004-10-24 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 09:50:02PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > Stephane Raimbault wrote: > >I'm currently using a freebsd box running natd to forward port 80 to > >several (5) web servers on private IP's. > > > >I have discovered that natd doesn't handle many requests/second all that > >well

Re: using natd to load balance port 80 to multiple servers

2004-10-24 Thread Julian Elischer
Stephane Raimbault wrote: Hi All, I'm currently using a freebsd box running natd to forward port 80 to several (5) web servers on private IP's. I have discovered that natd doesn't handle many requests/second all that well (seem to choke at about 200 req/second (educated guess)) use the "ipfw fw

Re: using natd to load balance port 80 to multiple servers

2004-10-23 Thread Chuck Swiger
Stephane Raimbault wrote: I'm currently using a freebsd box running natd to forward port 80 to several (5) web servers on private IP's. OK. I have discovered that natd doesn't handle many requests/second all that well (seem to choke at about 200 req/second (educated guess)) Let's take that number

Re: using natd to load balance port 80 to multiple servers

2004-10-23 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, Stephane Raimbault wrote: > I'm currently using a freebsd box running natd to forward port 80 to several > (5) web servers on private IP's. > > I have discovered that natd doesn't handle many requests/second all that > well (seem to choke at about 200 req/second (educated gues