Re: tcp/udp performance

2006-09-05 Thread Danny Braniss
> Jack Vogel wrote: > > On 8/30/06, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> ever since 6.1 I've seen fluctuations in the performance of > >> the em (Intel(R) PRO/1000 Gigabit Ethernet). > >> > >> motherboard OBN (On Board NIC) > >>

Re: tcp/udp performance

2006-09-05 Thread Thomas Herrlin
Jack Vogel wrote: > On 8/30/06, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> ever since 6.1 I've seen fluctuations in the performance of >> the em (Intel(R) PRO/1000 Gigabit Ethernet). >> >> motherboard OBN (On Board NIC) >>

Re: tcp/udp performance

2006-09-04 Thread Marcelo Gardini do Amaral
> > > >Any help? > > > >danny > > Have discussed this some internally, the best idea I've heard is that > UDP is not giving us the interrupt rate that TCP would, so we end up > not cleaning up as often, and thus descriptors might not be as quickly > available.. Its just speculation at this

Re: tcp/udp performance

2006-08-30 Thread Jack Vogel
On 8/30/06, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ever since 6.1 I've seen fluctuations in the performance of the em (Intel(R) PRO/1000 Gigabit Ethernet). motherboard OBN (On Board NIC) -- 1- Intel SE

Re: tcp/udp performance

2006-08-30 Thread Mohan Srinivasan
Hi, 1) Have you made sure there are no NFS rexmits reported by nfsstat -c ? 2) I haven't run thruput tests lately, but when I tested NFS/UDP thruput a few months ago, I routinely got over 70MB/s sequential read thruput and over 80MB/s sequential write thruput (against filers). I use

Re: tcp/udp performance

2006-08-30 Thread Claus Guttesen
test 1: writing to a NetApp filer via NFS/UDP FreeBSD Linux MegaBytes/sec 1- Average: 18.48 32.61 2- Average: 15.69 35.72 3- Average: 16.61 29.69 (interstingly, doing NFS/TCP instead of NFS/UDP shows an increas